Disgraceful De Villiers
In a surreal press conference, Peter de Villiers continued to deny Schalk Burger was guilty of eye gouging and delivered some of his most sensational rubbish ever.
De Villiers on Monday held court with a room full of journalists, the majority of those from the foreign press, and proceeded to spit the most ridiculous nonsense, and display an incredibly pompous and dismissive attitude, particularly towards the foreign contingent. For those present it was obvious that he has a very low opinion of them.
The questioning predictably centred around Burger’s eight-week ban for eye gouging Lions wing Luke Fitzgerald, an issue that the Springbok media team tried to dodge by saying that they would only comment after they had received an official report on the incident. You didn’t need an official report to know that Burger is unbelievably lucky not to receive a longer ban.
On Saturday De Villiers left the press incredulous by saying that Burger didn’t deserve a yellow card for the incident, let alone a citing. On Monday the coach had an opportunity to retract that ludicrous statement and concede that he was wrong. Yet he remained resolute in his flawed view.
‘I stand by Schalk, I’m still convinced he didn’t do it,’ he told keo.co.za. ‘When you watch the footage closely and if you know the nature of Schalk, you’ll know that he will never go to those measures to impose himself. Schalk certainly didn’t do anything on purpose. He watched the TV footage and was taken aback himself.
‘I am against anything that is against the spirit of the game. If we want to eye gouge lions, we’ll go down to the bushveld and eye gouge them there, then see if they can haul us in.’
When one of the travelling pressmen continued the line of questioning, De Villiers snapped, ‘Some of us seem to have a hearing problem. We’re waiting for the official report and we’ll see what that says. If they find him guilty of something we’ll abide by that decision.
‘I’m not ducking the issue, I’m working within a system. I’m not like you [the media] who don’t work within a system.’
De Villiers said he doesn’t condone foul play [the likes of which Burger was clearly guilty of], yet continued to inadvertently justify the incident.
‘Rugby is a contact sport and so is dancing,’ he said. ‘If you guys [the media] were clued up you’d know that there were so many incidents that we could have complained about, like the incident where a Lions player maliciously jumped into one of ours with their shoulder.
‘But we didn’t do it because this is a contact sport. If you are going to complain about every incident we might as well go to a ballet shop and all get tutus.’
Despite the series victory, there is a widely held view that the Springboks beat the Lions despite of their coach and not because of him. De Villiers’ rebuttal, ‘Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but I don’t react to opinion, I react to fact,’ he said.
‘If I’m the weakest link then we are bloody strong. I’m a God-given talent. I am the best I can be. I know what I am and I don’t give a damn.’
He continued by saying he didn’t read the papers, and therefore didn’t know how he was perceived in the media.
‘I don’t care. I don’t take an interest in your job, but I’m glad you take an interest in mine.’
Any preceding Springbok coach would have been seriously taken to task by the administration, but De Villiers gives one the impression, through his attitude and unbridled hogwash that he delivered on Monday, that he believes he is a law unto himself.
The reality is that he was an embarrassment to South African rugby, as he was when he offered his racially loaded views relating to Ricky Januarie, for which he will have to answer to the president’s council.
The same president’s council who appointed him based on his skin colour and not his rugby credentials (they confirmed this themselves when announcing his appointment), are now pointing the finger at him when they should be held partly accountable for the perception he is creating of himself, and by association, the Springboks, and South Africans in general.
De Villiers considers himself to be an ambassador for South Africa. He has said so on numerous occasions. But he is doing anything but creating a favourable impression of this country.
He needs to be reined in immediately. Word from inside the Springbok camp is that he just refuses to listen to any advice offered by his media managers, and as a result he is destroying any credibility he might have left.
Today he was a disgrace and he’s single-handedly detracted from the wonderful achievement of winning a Lions series. Hopefully it’s the last time we’ll have to endure a senseless rant like this from De Villiers. Don’t hold your breath though.
By Ryan Vrede, Johannesburg


June 30th, 2009 at 2:12 pm
#849 gunther:
See my earlier post regarding fighting fire with fire. It is going to happen.
That Squirrel Sheridan was not cited only goes to show that with the benefit of the tape the commissioner saw all the other punches going in that he could not single out any particular person without citing the majority of the Bokke team and I dare say a fair few of the Lions teams. You will recall that the Lions players said that they were amongst other thing, being punched off the ball all the time.
To say that Burger unintentionally got hold of Fitzy’s head, then place, again unintentionally whilst looking at what he was doing, continue to rub his fingers in Fitzy’s eye area before Fitzy managed to get him off is quite frankly a lie of biblical proportions, and are not worthy of any further comment, save that the disciplinary committee thought it was gouging, handed down a 2 month sentence, and the Bokke management agree that it was gouging as they are not appealing it. Yet strangely, you and some of the other head banging Dutchm@n on here don’t.
You will tell me next that Hitler and the nazi didn’t really kill 6 million Jews next.
June 30th, 2009 at 2:20 pm
#845 Sir_Charles_Napier:
who bit who in the testicles? the only testicular action was from sheridan… I love the way you make it look like the “thuggery was one-sided” also was what de villiers said worse than phillips’ comments after the game…. he basically called the ref a cheat…this is why playing the ritish and Irish sides is getting boring… the whine factor and bullsh1t outweighs any enjoyment derived from the experience…
June 30th, 2009 at 2:23 pm
#851 Sir_Charles_Napier: Burger is an idiot because he was caught, no other reason. How do you think players get knocks everywhere when they get out of a scrum. Have you ever played rugby and if you have have you ever ended underneath a maul or a ruck.
If you have then stop complaining. Burger got what he deserved because he got caught. If you are saying that the BILs are angels and only play by teh rules and the Boks are heathens then talk to someone who has played some real rugby in SA on tour 20 years ago. Punching, gouging, kicking, raking and so on have always been part of the game and they will always be. Locks are notrious dogs when it come to that. If you cannot accept that then maybe you should change your sport of favour to rythmic gymnastics.
June 30th, 2009 at 2:33 pm
#854 Objective 101:
Lol! “Punching, gouging, kicking, raking and so on have always been part of the game and they will always be”.
spoken like a true Bokke!
The problem is that the rest of the world think that Bokke thuggery has no place in the modern game. Clean up your act or it will be cleaned up for you.
June 30th, 2009 at 2:37 pm
#852 Objective 101:
you cannot reason with him … he is a one-eyed little mick with a lonely drum to bang and only one tune to play…
June 30th, 2009 at 2:53 pm
#854 Sir_Charles_Napier: Those were part of the BIL game my friend. If you cannto come to terms with it at least have the decency to listen to an interview with the leader of the 1974 BILs Bill Beaumont about his cry to war and all out brawling. Anyway maybe that is why you lot cannot beat SH teams anymore. You have gone soft. Yep you lot have become softies, what you cal then Tellie Tubbies. Like BOD, he high tackles a player and ends up being concussed himself and your famous loose head who tried to punch our lock in the nuts but missed. Differene is we don’t complain, we play because what goes around comes around. Shame I feel sorry for you.
Next time the BILs tour they wil ask the Boks to wear tutus and ballet dancing shoes.
June 30th, 2009 at 8:22 pm
Quite frankly I find myself supporting Peter de Villiers for once – because he is the first South African official to stand by his man when the flak’s coming from all angles, arguably for good reason. Historically the SA administrators have thrown their players to the wolves and never stood by them – with the possible exception of Luis Luyt.
I think this will endear P de Villiers to the players – good on him.
June 30th, 2009 at 10:08 pm
Defending an eye-gouger or a biter is about as ridiculous as defending Osama Bin Laden. Thinking people think you’re nuts.
July 1st, 2009 at 12:21 pm
Piet will say anything for a case of Schalk Burger export wine.