Brüssow steals the show

Fetchers may be a dime a dozen but when it comes to the breakdown, only Heinrich Brüssow is capable of the perfect crime.

Click here to subscribe

In the new issue of SA Rugby magazine, on sale this week, the Bok flanker explains his approach to stealing ball at the breakdown, why he always tests referees early on in a game, and why he doesn’t consider himself to be a cheat.

In the same article, Jake White gets technical and explains why Brüssow has been able to impress in what is a new game under new laws.

Also in the new issue:

SA’s Super 14 stars: Ruan Pienaar, Gary Botha, Bryan Habana and Carlos Spencer

– How technological advancements will aid the management of our players in terms of their conditioning

– We speak to three of the world’s best rugby minds about the state of the game

– Gert Smal on his role in Irish rugby, cracking the Bok lineout, and his plan to develop black players, which was ignored by Saru

– The 2010 Six Nations marks 100 years of French participation in the European championship. We find out how they went from tournament whipping boys to eight-time Grand Slam champions

– Zac Guildford will never forget 2009, for good and bad reasons. But all indications are that 2010 could be even more memorable on the rugby field for one of New Zealand’s brightest talents

– Former Bulls lock Hendrik Roodt on signing for the Waratahs, whether he’d consider playing for the Wallabies, and why he can’t wait to test himself against Bakkies Botha and Victor Matfield

Frans Steyn on playing for Racing Metro, his fractured relationship with Peter de Villiers, and why inside centre is his preferred position

PLUS: A giant 2010 fixtures poster that covers everything from the Super 14 and Varsity Cup to the Currie Cup and Springbok end-of-year tour


182 Comments

Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 » Show All

  • 101.Blouste: Reply to this comment

    Why are there a discusion on the WC’s if its the first week of S14 ?

  • 102.Nils: Reply to this comment

    @Blouste: Fair remark.

  • 103.FireStraeuli: Reply to this comment

    @Nils: So the tears were actualy tears of typical AB arrogance, expecting to win the wc before actualy even making the semi’s. B.t.w. didnt see Ireland crying either…they were actualy the favoured NH team.

  • 104.Nils: Reply to this comment

    @FireStraeuli: Alright, we can safely leave this topic till next year’s October when we will see who cries and who not. Do you agree?

  • 105.FireStraeuli: Reply to this comment

    @Blouste: The best way to get our New Zealand counterparts all emotional and riled up…just some innocent fun.

  • 106.Blouste: Reply to this comment

    All about much..and much about nothing…

    You AB guys…

    In what ranking order do you put your franchises this year ?

  • 107.Blouste: Reply to this comment

    @FireStraeuli:
    **** jou… :lol:

  • 108.FireStraeuli: Reply to this comment

    @Nils: Yep, check my comment to ‘blouste’ though. It’s nothing personal, just getting into the S14 spirit and getting under the oppositions skin…:grin:

  • 109.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    @FireStraeuli: not as arrogant as “Were the first ‘true’ world champions” that my friend, belongs solely to an Afrikaan…

    stone, glass house, hopefully you can make the link…

  • 110.Blouste: Reply to this comment

    I don’t think much can be read into the warm-up games, give me your different insides…

  • 111.Nils: Reply to this comment

    @Blouste: Saders, Canes, Landers, Blues, Chiefs. Just shot into the dark.

  • 112.bananaboy: Reply to this comment

    It is pure speculation as to how the Boks would have performed in 87 or 91 for that matter and I for one wouldn’t have rated their chances high under the circumstances. However one can also speculate that had their participation in Internationals not been curbed by the sanctions (which I’m not saying shouldn’t have happened)that the history of Internationals since re-admission would have been different. It becomes a futile exercise to try and second guess what would have/should have/could have happened. The past is exactly that “past”. The question now remains who is going to win the S14, 3N’s and next years World Cup. Far more worthwhile debating that.

    Tired of the “my dads d..k is bigger than yours” arguments.

  • 113.Nils: Reply to this comment

    @FireStraeuli: Fine. The same “nothing personal” to you guys. ;)

  • 114.Nils: Reply to this comment

    @bananaboy: Fully agree.

  • 115.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    @bananaboy: thats all this site is isnt it? :lol:

    @Blouste:

    saders
    canes
    blues
    highlanders
    chiefs

    toss up between blues and landers for third, losing Ali Williams was a big blow for my team, not sure they have the grunt in the tight five now…

  • 116.FireStraeuli: Reply to this comment

    @bananaboy: Well, your dad’s isnt, so that’s that…:lol:

  • 117.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69: the landers are my dark horse, there pack did boss the Bulls around last year, and they have some exciting backs.. I may place some hard earned on them making the semis..

  • 118.Blouste: Reply to this comment

    You’ve got the Chiefs in last?

    I reckon they can put one over the Sharks in the opener…

  • 119.FireStraeuli: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69:108 All’s fair in love and war, and rugby, it aint no love afair.

    @poppa69:114 Chiefs at the bottom, how so?

  • 120.Nils: Reply to this comment

    @Blouste: Only because Sharks look even worse. Chiefs are notorious poor starters and away start do not give them any favours, yet they look like slight favourites this week. Only just.

  • 121.Pearl Rose: Reply to this comment

    @Rum And Maple: lmao on the jake & zuma analogy, spot on! Both philanderers nogal!

  • 122.Black Panther: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69:

    and didnt Louis just cover the entire nation in glory with that one. You couldnt make that stuff up without laughing.

    You see, when Safas say Clive Norling got a ‘gold watch’ in 1981 its because corruption is the only answer to defeat. Like anyone can be bought.

    Remember the teams walking out that following week too, not just Kiwis either.

  • 123.Blouste: Reply to this comment

    But saying that, thats probably because the Tjarks seem to be in a complete shambles…might be the Kiwi coach :lol:

  • 124.FireStraeuli: Reply to this comment

    Only reason for attacking the AB’s is the Bulls doesn’t seem to wanna come out and play….always easy to rub them the wrong way and watch them passionatley tare all nay sayers to pieces…it’s the thing that makes Keo addictive.

  • 125.Black Panther: Reply to this comment

    @Kea-Cat: @96

    I just drove thru North Acton this am in fact. If I’d known there those pedestrians were Safas, I would have bumped them a little harder.

  • 126.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    @Blouste: I think they can beat the sharks first up too, but only because the sharks appear to be in disarray… Im not sure who the chiefs will be playing at 1st 5 Donald or Delaney? not sold on either to be honest.. and with Lauaki leading them, just doesnt instil me with confidence..

    always happy to be proven wrong though..

  • 127.Blouste: Reply to this comment

    Mind you…it all makes sense now !!!

    Sharks have an All-Black coach…that’s why they are South Africas CHOKERS !!! :lol:

  • 128.Staal: Reply to this comment

    Clive Norling? He still alive?

  • 129.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    @Black Panther: France and England and I believe the officials themselves too…

    still, like Ritchie crying after the 07 qter final, we dont wont to represent a whole nation on the actions of one man..

    or do we Strauli LMFAO !!

  • 130.FireStraeuli: Reply to this comment

    @Blouste: Oooh, now blouste is coming to the party. Ja, same problem the Ozzies are facing next year, a NZ coach. lolz

  • 131.Black Panther: Reply to this comment

    @bananaboy: @111

    oh blah blah blah

    we were

    blah blah blah

    bigger better

    blah blah blah

    “but Im tired of these my-****-is-bigger arguments”

    oh, and BTW, when you say ‘sanctions’, every single NZ team that toured SA pre-92 did so under extreme ‘sanctions’ that deprived them of some of their best players. Fact. Ever see Waka Nathan – Auckland Capt & NZs star player – grace the fields of SA ?

  • 132.Blouste: Reply to this comment

    Who are being rested or injured for the first rounds in NZ ?

  • 133.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    @Blouste: lol not sure hes ever coached the ABS Blouste?

    but he learnt all about choking from his SA wife didnt he?

  • 134.Black Panther: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69:

    all SemiFs were there too, hence Engl walking out. On that ocassion, even the Gallic Shrug was insufficient.

    And they were ‘hosts’ ?!

  • 135.Rum And Maple: Reply to this comment

    @Pearl Rose: Yip, sou see they are prone to changing their minds a lot…

    Hence this new found fetcher insight by old Jake…

  • 136.Nils: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69: That Kiwi won CC after all, didn’t he? If my memory serves me right, Sharks were empty-handed for 12 years before that.

  • 137.FireStraeuli: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69: Oi oi, dont be getting my name wrong now. Anti-Straeuli = FireStraeuli. I never said all AB’s were softies, just Ritchie, ’95 not a tear was shed by AB’s.

    Might have been a respect thing though, btw, Lyut was unceremoniously kicked out of South African rugby shrotly after ’95 because of his greed, he’s never been a hero of anybody ever.

  • 138.Blouste: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69:
    He choked her ? :shock:

  • 139.Blouste: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69:
    The only choking he could do here in SA, thats untill he got a hold of the poor Tjarks… :cry:

  • 140.Dawn: Reply to this comment

    WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE!

    Simon asked nicely what you think of the new mag and the articles.

    Not one of you, except me, gave him feedback.

    That’s why the Monarchs think we are a bunch of wallies.

  • 141.stormer in a teacup: Reply to this comment

    @Staal: Dunno. Check his watch.

  • 142.Blouste: Reply to this comment

    Guys, check # 132

  • 143.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    @FireStraeuli: post 128 my friend… :D He was very lucky that day, apparently a few of the ABs were on their way to the head table to take him to task for those comments.. we all have our lousy administrators, hell, Steve tew hasnt exactly endeared himself to the NZ public either..

    @Blouste: yep, apparently Plumtree is a HUGE fan of Micheal Hutchence.. hahahaha

  • 144.Rum And Maple: Reply to this comment

    @Dawn: Gave my feedback @ 76.

  • 145.FireStraeuli: Reply to this comment

    @Dawn: Oi, i told him i smaaked the cover, directly below the part where you sommer ordered him to leave you and that other one alone…aka kicked him out of his own article.

  • 146.Black Panther: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69: @128

    I went to see Counties vs Springboks in 1994. At the aftermatch, a few Boks walked in in those fantastic blazers of theirs and the whole place buzzed with excitement ‘the Boks are here !’, it sent shivvers down my spine having those guys on my turf in our clubrooms (ahem, make that adjoining gymnasium).

    About 10mins later, in walked Louis Luyt. He brushed right passed me. The place immediately turned as quiet as a morgue. His reputation preceded him, he was always filthy disrespectful about the ABs. It remained so until he left about 15mins later, and the place livened up again.

    And this 1year before he said “we would have beaten Australia in the morning (reigning RWChamps) and the All Blacks in the afternoon”.

    They left NZ in 1994, having been bumped 2-0, without 1 good word to say about their hosts or the rugby.

  • 147.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    @Dawn: cmon Dawnie, weve been served up so many “copy and paste” articles on this site in the name of “journalism”, how many people actually read the articles anymore… something about cause and effect?

  • 148.Dawn: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69:

    I’m also a Hutchence fan.

    Something wrong with that?

  • 149.Blouste: Reply to this comment

    Dawn…bad time for you.. :lol:

  • 150.FireStraeuli: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69: Yep, no arguing that, Luyt was and probably still is an A-class numb-nuts.

Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 » Show All

Keo.co.za has always promoted uncensored views, but has never tolerated racist or crass outbursts. Come on guys and girls. If you can't moderate yourselves or each other then I am going to be forced to regulate the posts and enforce a registration process for comments. The choice is yours.

Have your say

You must be logged in to post a comment.