Preview: Wallabies vs All Blacks

JON CARDINELLI foresees another Blackout this weekend as the Wallabies won’t be able to live with the All Blacks’ physicality.

Last Saturday, the Wallabies landed a blow that sent the Springboks down to the Tri-Nations canvas. They were rougher, tougher and ultimately smarter, and at the end of the Australasian tour from hell, the Boks had no reply.

The Wallabies’ dream start, however, will be short lived. They have home advantage, but they’re playing a team that’s grown stronger with every game this season.

After a scrappy start against Ireland and Wales, the All Blacks hit their straps against the Boks to score two bonus-point wins. They also managed to limit their opponents to two tries in two matches and 29 points overall.

The Aussies enjoyed similar success on the defensive front, but relied heavily on the boot of Matt Giteau to see them home. Their superior physical display was complemented by their ability to retain possession for long periods, and halfbacks Will Genia and Quade Cooper were instrumental in penetrating the Bok defence.

The All Blacks won’t be so generous. They smashed the Boks at the tackle at Eden Park and at the Cake Tin. In Richie McCaw, they have a player capable of slowing or stealing possession, and this will be key considering the All Blacks need to disrupt the Wallabies’ rhythm.

Cooper’s suspension is a setback for the hosts, even though Giteau is a more than competent 10. Whether he can offer Australia the same attacking edge is doubtful.

Neither Giteau nor Berrick Barnes are known for their abilities to take on the defence, and this, along with Australia’s likely loss at the collisions, is bound to limit the hosts’ overall potency. The All Blacks, having dominated the tackle point, had an easy time marshalling South Africa’s wide forays, and we should see more of the same in Melbourne.

The set-pieces will be interesting with Stephen Moore bolstering the Wallabies scrum and Nathan Sharpe sure to test an All Blacks lineout that enjoyed plenty of success against the Boks. But it will come down to the breakdowns and collisions, and the Aussies will play more territorially.

The Wallabies hardly kicked last week because they didn’t need to. The momentum was provided through their breakdown superiority, and as long as they retained possession, they usually prospered. This week, they’ll be outmatched in this area. They will strive for good field position and then try to build an attack from deep within All Blacks’ territory.

The Blacks will continue to employ their surge and destroy brand, although the Wallabies’ defence will be tougher to breach than that of the Boks. Dan Carter will vary his play in the early stages, and only once a comfortable lead’s been established will the visitors cut loose.

It may not be another bonus-point victory, but the win should bring the All Blacks one step closer to reclaiming the Tri-Nations title.

Prediction: All Blacks by 10

Wallabies – 15 Adam Ashley-Cooper, 14 James O’Connor, 13 Rob Horne, 12 Berrick Barnes, 11 Drew Mitchell, 10 Matt Giteau, 9 Will Genia, 8 Richard Brown, 7 David Pocock, 6 Rocky Elsom (c), 5 Nathan Sharpe, 4 Dean Mumm, 3 Salesi Ma’afu, 2 Stephen Moore, 1 Benn Robinson.
Subs: 16 Saia Faingaa, 17 James Slipper, 18 Rob Simmons, 19 Matt Hodgson, 20 Luke Burgess, 21 Anthony Faingaa, 22 Kurtley Beale.

All Blacks – 15 Mils Muliaina, 14 Cory Jane, 13 Conrad Smith, 12 Ma’a Nonu, 11 Joe Rokocoko, 10 Dan Carter, 9 Jimmy Cowan; 8 Kieran Read, 7 Richie McCaw, 6 Jerome Kaino, 5 Tom Donnelly, 4 Brad Thorn, 3 Owen Franks, 2 Keven Mealamu, 1 Tony Woodcock.
Subs: 16 Corey Flynn, 17 Ben Franks, 18 Sam Whitelock, 19 Victor Vito, 20 Piri Weepu, 21 Aaron Cruden, 22 Israel Dagg.

Follow JC on Twitter

Follow SA Rugby mag on Twitter



286 Comments

  • 1.flanka: Reply to this comment

    cooper suspension is a big blow….they’re in need of Ioane’s physicality coz this week O’Connor will be taken back to school as he always is against the all blacks

  • 2.Muttonbird: Reply to this comment

    All Black – Fire breathing Dragons

  • 3.Muttonbird: Reply to this comment

    Damn it!

  • 4.Muttonbird: Reply to this comment

    s

  • 5.Muttonbird: Reply to this comment

    @flanka(flanka)-1: O’Conner is a bit small isn’t he? Cruden has that problem too but size is not quite as crucial at 10 as it is at 15.

  • 6.flanka: Reply to this comment

    @Muttonbird(Muttonbird)-5: cruden is a bit of a stick…don’t get me wrong, o’connor’s no twig but when he gets roughed up earlier on he tends to go missing for the rest of the game and that was clear in last years bledisloes especially when they bombarded him with the high ball….that all black back 3 is just too classy and to think dagg’s on the bench..

  • 7.TheTackler: Reply to this comment

    @Muttonbird(Muttonbird)-5: Naas Botha couldn’t tackle an angry 8 year old girl, and he regularly ended matches with the cleanest pair of white shorts in the team. Didn’t stop him from being one of the finest flyhalves in history. Naas always had great protection in his channel from his openside flanker and no.8.

  • 8.Muttonbird: Reply to this comment

    Eligibility:

    O’Connor was eligible for all 3 Tri Nations teams because of his New Zealand born parents and South African born Grandmother. He was a Parramatta Eels rugby league junior in Sydney before switching over to rugby union at 15.

  • 9.Muttonbird: Reply to this comment

    @TheTackler(TheTackler)-7: Harder to do that in today’s game? Flatter defences, players marking one-on-one, video analysis to concemtrate on weaknesses etc.

    You see a lot of 10′s scrag-tackle these days to slow a player while another defender comes to finish him off. Dan Carter does this. Gregan did it a lot. Wilkinson did not – brave as Custer but he was not mindful of his body and that’s why he’s fcked now.

  • 10.HongKongSlong: Reply to this comment

    All Blacks used to put Mehrtens in at full back for first phase defence towards the end of his career and the Irish have done the same with O’Gara. The need to smash someone back in the tackle or stop them on the advantage line is greater at fly half and centre then it is at full back generally.

  • 11.DonutDunning: Reply to this comment

    @Muttonbird(Muttonbird)-9: Gregan was the master of the small-man tackle, using the player’s own momentum against them.
    Was the only Wallaby I ever saw that could take down Lomu one-on-one.
    Surprised that more teams don’t take him on as a defense consultant, especially for their flyhalves.

  • 12.Muttonbird: Reply to this comment

    @DonutDunning(DonutDunning)-11: Yeah, he hung around the neck like a dead albatross.

  • 13.Muttonbird: Reply to this comment

    Anyway:

    All Blacks 32 – 22 Wallabies

  • 14.DonutDunning: Reply to this comment

    @Muttonbird(Muttonbird)-12: Modified version of one of the staple Judo throws, extremely effective.
    Growing up I used to have to spar against Julian Salvi (now plying his trade with Bath and the Brumbies), who was a good 20-25kg my superior. Was the only way to take him down :D

  • 15.DonutDunning: Reply to this comment

    Back to the game, I think the loss of Cooper may actually work in the Wallabies favour to an extent.
    The All Blacks no doubt had a plan to shut him out of the game very early on by unsettling him, something I am surprised that Schalk and Danie etc did not do last week.
    Barnes, while not having the same flair, is the most level headed player in the Wallaby setup, and his midfield defense is much stronger than a Cooper-Giteau combination.

    Very even in many facets, but Wallabies will probably struggle at the breakdown unless they really put in the hard yards.

    Wallabies by 5.

  • 16.Muttonbird: Reply to this comment

    No Gregan now though and while Genia looks the goods, he’s still inexperienced, and unlike Gregan, won’t be able to psychologically beat the AB’s before the game’s kicked off.

  • 17.whatever: Reply to this comment

    @DonutDunning(DonutDunning)-15:

    Brave call :)

  • 18.Muttonbird: Reply to this comment

    @DonutDunning(DonutDunning)-15: The Wallabies do usually make the most of their hometown advantage and unless the Blacks put in a performance like Ak or even Wgtn it will be difficult to win. I’m picking that they will hold their intensity though.

  • 19.Muttonbird: Reply to this comment

    “Celebrating Heaven’s Game Competition!” – Competition on KEO.

    WTF? Why would you want to celebrate that monki-fcker?

  • 20.Slartibartfast: Reply to this comment

    @DonutDunning(DonutDunning)-15:

    They tried but they could not get to him…

  • 21.HongKongSlong: Reply to this comment

    Its a shame about Cooper being banned (pathetic decision Bakkies is the only player who should of been banned) I would have favoured the Wallabies at home with him and Genia playing so well in tandem along with the rest of the team. I still reckon that the Aussie can win this one however. The Boks have made both teams look better, by not playing with a recognised fetcher against the likes of Mcaw and Pocock is pretty much suicide!

  • 22.TheTackler: Reply to this comment

    @Muttonbird(Muttonbird)-9: Dan Carter is a VERY good tackler, quite willing and able to cut off a ball-carrier at the knee. Scragging around the collar is not his preferred style.

  • 23.JL1: Reply to this comment

    @Muttonbird(Muttonbird)-13: I think the ABs will run away with this one
    ABs confidence is very high and Aussies are a very poor streak against the ABs

    I did not see anything special from the Aussies against the Boks

  • 24.JL1: Reply to this comment

    @Muttonbird(Muttonbird)-19: Why the anger, did you two lovers break up?

  • 25.DonutDunning: Reply to this comment

    @HongKongSlong(HongKongSlong)-21: I’m hoping they get Hodgson on the field early in place of Brown.
    More effective at the breakdown than Brown, so would help Pocock counterract King Richie.
    Brown is not that strong a ball runner anyway.

  • 26.JL1: Reply to this comment

    @DonutDunning(DonutDunning)-25: Pocock is a Zimbabwean is he not?

  • 27.DonutDunning: Reply to this comment

    @JL1(JL1)-26: Yes, moved to Aus when he was about 12 I believe.

  • 28.JL1: Reply to this comment

    I wonder if Robbie Deans would like to coach the Boks?I think he is gonna be u under pressure at the end of the 3Nations

  • 29.Bok fan: Reply to this comment

    21. Hong kong – yes it is but for some reason sa coaches refuse to learn this fact. I doubt we’ll play a fetcher in the home leg and no F louw is not a fetcher

  • 30.flanka: Reply to this comment

    @JL1(JL1)-26: kicked off their farm when he was 14…of course it wouldnt have mattered if he stayed in africa coz the ANC would toss him around regarding eligibility for the springboks :-D

  • 31.Muttonbird: Reply to this comment

    @JL1(JL1)-24: I’m new here but it didn’t take long for us not to see eye-to-eye.

  • 32.HongKongSlong: Reply to this comment

    @DonutDunning(DonutDunning)-25: Why do you reckon they are ignoring Higginbotham? He was awesome in the super 14. Maybe he still needs a few more games to get back to full fitness?
    @Bok fan(Bok fan)-29: Until Stegman got injured last week, I thought he should have been brought into the team. People are obsessed with looking at players individually, but the combination and balance is crucial as well. A lot of people seem to think that Brusseuw wont be as effective under the new law interpretations, but I disagree. Pocock gave away 4 penalties against the Boks, for having his hands on the ball, and Ritchie Macaw did as well, but they slowed down the Boks and turned over a lot of possession, which meant there was no decent continuity at all for South Africa and hence the lack of trys. Brusseuw would have done the same, but the Boks chose otherwise.

  • 33.Muttonbird: Reply to this comment

    @TheTackler(TheTackler)-22: Agreed. Has enough time and is smart enough to copy-book tackle when necessary but scrag when with supporting defenders thereby saving his body and increasing his longevity.

  • 34.DonutDunning: Reply to this comment

    @HongKongSlong(HongKongSlong)-32: He is just coming back from an injury picked up late in the S14, I don’t think Deans wants to rush him back in.
    Plus he really seems to rate Brown, I don’t know why (same with Burgess).

    I’m also surprised that Stegmann wasn’t brought in, or at least Flouw given more time (after one bad game where whole forward pack were bad), especially after seeing how powerful Brussow was last year.

  • 35.Slartibartfast: Reply to this comment

    @HongKongSlong(HongKongSlong)-32:

    Higginbottom was injured for a period, he only got back to playing a week before the team was announced. He is part of the squad and will get a run sooner or later. It does however appear if Deans have a thing for Brown…

  • 36.DonutDunning: Reply to this comment

    @DonutDunning(DonutDunning)-34: By rushed back in, I just mean in, as it would be his debut. No point ruining him by throwing him into a Bledisloe not at 100%

  • 37.Slartibartfast: Reply to this comment

    @DonutDunning(DonutDunning)-34:

    SNAP!!!

  • 38.DonutDunning: Reply to this comment

    @Slartibartfast(Slartibartfast)-37: Great minds, etc :lol:

  • 39.Slartibartfast: Reply to this comment

    @Slartibartfast(Slartibartfast)-37:

    Times 2!

    To think he was just a no name at the start of the season. One of the best things that could have happened to Oz rugby appears the sacking and hiring of Link from the Tahs to the Reds. Cooper is another who is a totally different player than last year.

  • 40.Slartibartfast: Reply to this comment

    @DonutDunning(DonutDunning)-38:

    I know, the injury bit I can understand, the Brown bit is a bit scary :shock:

  • 41.flanka: Reply to this comment

    @Slartibartfast(Slartibartfast)-35: Scott Higginbotham is a phenomenal loose forward….to be completely honest he is what Spies SHOULD be…he can come up with the flash plays to outsprint backs but he also gets involved in the dirty work. I’ll never forget him outsprinting Olivier over 50m to gather the ball for a try

  • 42.Slartibartfast: Reply to this comment

    @flanka(flanka)-41:

    He puts in the hard yards if and when required, just like you would expect and unlike the super human speciment…

  • 43.Great White Shark: Reply to this comment

    The most boring thread on keo to date.

  • 44.DonutDunning: Reply to this comment

    Longterm I would like to see Higginbotham converted to a number 8, as it is the backrow spot lacking real depth in Australia.
    After Palu, who is prone to regular form drops as is, there is a lack of a Test class no8.
    Brown is sound without being spectacular, while Hoiles really needs to be about 10kg bigger to be effective at Test level.

    After Elsom we have Mumm, Mitch Chapman and Hodgson, who I all believe are capable of playing 6 at Test level.

    Higginbotham has all the attributes and attitude to be a number 8 in the Kefu mould.

  • 45.Slartibartfast: Reply to this comment

    @DonutDunning(DonutDunning)-44:

    Was he not originally selected as a #8 for the Reds? With the early injuries there was a reshuffle…

  • 46.DonutDunning: Reply to this comment

    @Slartibartfast(Slartibartfast)-45: You may be right. I just remember that for most of the season Leroy Houston was at number 8 over him, which annoyed me.

  • 47.Slartibartfast: Reply to this comment

    @DonutDunning(DonutDunning)-46:

    I am sure Link swapped them but to long ago to remember…

    Right, beer o’clock, I am off. Enjoy the weekend and the rugby and catch all on the rebound…

  • 48.Brad DK: Reply to this comment

    All Blacks by 15

  • 49.Brigadier Van Zyl: Reply to this comment

    will be a bit bloody funny if the ozzies win both their home tests against the kiwis.

    they’ve lost 7 on the bounce against them, eventually they are going to win 1.

    ozzies by 5?

  • 50.mshiniwami: Reply to this comment

    Will be a good game,first Bledisloe Cup game of the year plus Aus with home advantage.

    Will be harder for Ab’s than everyone thinks.If Pocock & Brown can compete on the ground with a fair amount of success it will limit AB effectiveness as they depend largely on quick ball.If they get it-THEY WILL DESTROY AUS.

    With the return of Robinson & Moore upfront,will add much needed stability.

    Barnes at 12 will be crucial,he is one of the best tactical kickers in the game.will need to kick accurately though.

    It will be close.

    BUT

    Dont see the Ab’s losing this one,their pack is humming,loose trio operating at optimum.And while halfbacks have been ok,Smith/Nonu have been outstanding.But the real man of the series with Boks (along with McCaw),is Mils Muliaina-back at his irrepressible best.Kick aimlessly-you will be punished.

    (if game opens up,it would be nice to see Vito & Dagg in for 20/30 min…that’ll be fireworks!!)

    AB’s by 5

  • 51.mshiniwami: Reply to this comment

    @DonutDunning(DonutDunning)-46:

    Leeroy Houston seems to be highly rated in OZ,went on tour with Wallabies a few yrs back as a 19 yr old.

    I believe he has the tangibles to become a Kefu type 8 as well but it’ll never come to fruition due mainly to his conditioning.Which is pathethic.Period.

  • 52.captain fantail: Reply to this comment

    @Muttonbird(Muttonbird)-13: Very genorous of you giving the margins you have. I think the Ab’s will be looking at between 19-24 points over the Wallabies.
    You have to take into account they played a team (Boks) that had just had the snot belted out them for two weeks running and then they let in two try’s as well. I think the margins will be quite even going to the sheds at the break but the AB’s will put on the surgeons gloves and take them apart piece by piece in the last thirty. I think they may even give the Wallabies bigger shock than the Boks.
    Looking at guys like O’conner, they will hammer the like of him and wear out the tough guys with their relentless style of play and as the Wallabys are not a team that really all stand up and are counted the onslaught will be too much for a few to handle.
    AB’s 35+ Wallabies 15-

  • 53.muffy: Reply to this comment

    I think those that say O’Conner and Barnes can’t tackle are a bit misguided, I saw him drop Big Vic and Guthro, plus a few big Figians this year. He has very good technique IMO

    Barnes had a tackle count of 24 on one super 14 game. That’s huge. I rate him as one of the best defensive backs around.

    Before the Bok game I also wanted Higgenbottom in place of Brown, bur Brown had a big game and you cant drop him off the back of his best game. Stanaforth too is up there, a real blue collar player.

    Amazing, a depth argument/discussion on a wallaby thread…Good signs for the future?

    Last year was supposed to be the best tri-nations….I recon this is going to go down to the last few matches…here’s hoping

  • 54.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @muffy(muffy)-53: yep i saw that! He dropped guthro big time, got him around the legs and floored him. Good technique as you said!

  • 55.Bok fan: Reply to this comment

    @HongKongSlong(HongKongSlong)-32: You spot on and the test season has shown that the new laws will have little effect on someone like Brussow’s contribution.

    Yip with Brussow and Stegman out, we have very little options to be honest. Quite scary but not surprising since the coaches in SA are clueless when it comes to balance in a lose trio

  • 56.Bok fan: Reply to this comment

    @Bok fan(Bok fan)-55: Maybe Derrick Kuhn?

  • 57.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    I enjoy this bloke’s column, no frills or useless bits just the facts.

    ADAM FREIER
    July 25, 2010

    The power of the press and how we are all
    at the mercy of the public and, in some
    cases, our peers has been evident during
    the week. Jason Akermanis is a special
    athlete and, by all reports, a unique
    individual
    .
    I don’t know Jason personally, but what I
    can take from his sacking is that he is a man
    who lives and dies by the sword – his
    opinion.

    Brendan Cannon’s comments towards Peter
    de Villiers, although harmless, sent
    shockwaves through the Springboks camp,
    and generated enough noise to provoke an
    apology. That’s the beauty and harsh nature
    of the media.

    But expressing an opinion on a player is the
    most delicate matter of all. It’s a challenge
    that all coaches face. How do I get the best
    out of that player without hurting them or
    the team? Using the press can be difficult,
    some have mastered it, while others don’t
    have to, which is an art in itself.
    Robbie Deans and Graham Henry are among
    the very few that don’t. These coaches are
    very much on similar parallels in ensuring
    their message is clear and precise, while
    protecting their greatest assets and still
    getting the best out of them.

    If you watch either of them being
    interviewed, they are professionals at
    making sure they don’t put their foot in it.
    One misinterpretation can create a
    completely different presentation. As we
    have seen with other coaches (should I say
    de Villiers?), imagine the devastation that
    would follow if Deans or Henry put their
    stars on notice at a press conference. It
    would be a media frenzy and it would take
    weeks for the team to get back on course.
    They don’t single out any particular players,
    their efforts or form with words, but
    introduce a little thing called ”healthy
    competition”.

    Henry started about 12 months ago with
    some of his All Blacks. Mils Muliaina has seen
    the emergence of plenty of stars all capable
    of wearing the All Blacks’ No.15 jumper like
    Cory Jane and Israel Dagg.

    What this has done is create a healthy
    nursery for a player to be the best they can
    possibly be. The result? Mils has stripped
    back a few kilograms and produced some
    devastating rugby at the end of a white-hot
    All Blacks back line.

    The same with Tony Woodcock, who has
    been New Zealand’s loosehead prop for
    many years. But this year Henry did not
    guarantee him a spot in the starting XV, or
    even the 22 following the arrival of the
    Franks brothers at the beginning of New
    Zealand’s international season. Woodcock
    has had to work hard to get back into the
    run-on side and looks leaner and meaner.
    Piri Weepu falls into the same category.
    Although he started against the Springboks
    through the injury to Jimmy Cowan, he still
    had to work extremely hard to bypass
    players such as the Blues’ Alby Mathewson
    and the Crusaders’ Andy Ellis. Would Weepu
    have been the player he was against South
    Africa if he was daylight in front of all No.9s
    in New Zealand?

    So let’s apply this method to our Wallabies
    stars. Nathan Sharpe’s international career
    appeared over in 2009 with Deans’s
    selection of James Horwill and Dean Mumm
    as Wallabies locks. The result: Sharpe played
    out of his skin for the Western Force in
    2010 and is playing the best rugby of his
    ?career, at the age of 32.

    Anthony Faingaa could turn Matt Giteau into
    the player he never thought he could be,
    too. Would he improve if the coach or some
    Wallabies legends in the media put him on
    notice through the press? Maybe. But most
    probably not.

    Then the most talked-about comeback of all,
    Drew Mitchell. Getting left out of the
    Wallabies squad and returning through
    injury, Mitchell worked overtime on his
    game.

    Would Mitchell have pushed himself if
    he was granted a walk-up start?
    There is no question my best season was
    when Tatafu Polota-Nau joined the
    Waratahs.

    Let’s hope Deans can continue to find ways
    of pushing the Wallabies without
    ‘Akermanising’ himself in the press.
    Two coaches, two nations. Same nationality,
    same applications in achieving the best
    from their men.

    Who has the better timing? This will be on
    show in Melbourne on Saturday night. Bring
    on the Bledisloe.

  • 58.muffy: Reply to this comment

    @Bok fan(Bok fan)-55: Brussow would be huge this year, low to the ground, fast, strong and ball hungry, not interested in the man (read Schalk), will be the first pick in my bok team when fit again

  • 59.Atreides: Reply to this comment

    @Bok fan(Bok fan)-55: They made a good point on Reunion last night, why pick 2 ball carriers at 7 & 8 if you aren’t gonna carry the ball?

    You’re spot on there….can’t wait to see Ratel back in the picture!!!

    Has anyone ever seen Spies actually lying on the ground?

  • 60.Atreides: Reply to this comment

    @muffy(muffy)-58: Yea he might not be as big as Pocock but he’s easily as strong

    Schalk’s history in my book too. Was disgusted with the way he clawed at Pocock’s face…..even before he slammed him, he was clawing at the side of his head…what is he, a frikkin schoolgirl???????

  • 61.Atreides: Reply to this comment

    @muffy(muffy)-53: How did Higginbotham not make the squad?

  • 62.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @Atreides(Atreides)-59:why should he? Spies stops runaway trucks my man! :D

  • 63.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @Atreides(Atreides)-61: higgins (meisiekind killer) was injured @ the end of s14 don’t know if he’s fine….

  • 64.Atreides: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-62: Lol…I’m not buying into all the Spies bashing so much, but he definitely needs to up his work-rate and get a bit more aggressive

  • 65.quotas_sux: Reply to this comment

    if higgins killedWO, imagine what we would do to de jongh … we all know how WO killed JDJ in the Super final

  • 66.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @quotas_sux(quota_conrad_jantjies_is_jorrie_muller)-65: um, de jongh would never be left behind by higginbotham in a sprint race, never hahahahaha :D

  • 67.quotas_sux: Reply to this comment

    nee, hy ken al weghardloop van die polisie in mitchelsplain

  • 68.Rugby-1: Reply to this comment

    @captain fantail(captain fantail)-52:

    Be careful with predictions like that, Poppa will be calling you an arrogant p**ck and slating your family & history – or does arrogance only apply to Saffa’s when they back their team?

    I think the All Blacks will win this but not by 20 points – I reckon around 7-10 points for this game. The Aussies will have a bit of confidence from last week despite how bad the Boks were so will give it plenty. Once you get them back to NZ then you can start talking about winning by 20+

  • 69.Bok fan: Reply to this comment

    @muffy(muffy)-58: Agreed. Like I’ve said before, the first 2 players in your side should be a reliable goalkicker (M Steyn) and a genuine fetcher (Brussow). Since Fdp is the best player on the planet he can be included with the above 2 names IMHO.

    @Atreides(Atreides)-59:
    Haha. You mean why pick 3 ball carriers if you not going to carry the ball. Spies is the most overrated player in SA with Brussow the most underrated

  • 70.Atreides: Reply to this comment

    @Rugby-1(Rugby-1)-68: Yea the AB’s are not going to stand back and let them hold onto the ball the way the Boks did….104 breakdowns and they retained possession 103 times? That’s a bit of an indictment on our loosies!!!

  • 71.Rugby-1: Reply to this comment

    @Atreides(Atreides)-70:

    Yes I agree, we were **** & going into a test match with no recognised fetcher was a seriosu step backwards. Have to wonder what the coaching staff do all week, that was a schoolboy error

    I just think the Aussies will be playing out their boots this weekend, and they do have a bit of confidence now. They will defend a lot better than we did and make it tough for the All Blacks. I still fancy the AB’s to win (they are a much better team), but talk of 20+ points is pretty arrogant considering the abuse these boys have been throwing at Saffa supporters for the very same thing!

  • 72.Bok fan: Reply to this comment

    @Atreides(Atreides)-70: Could you send that info to the coaches. I dont think they getting why we couldnt defend or get momentum going.

    I dont think it would help anyway because for some reason Pdv is thinking like Jake White re a fetcher.

  • 73.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    I see all the antipodean apologists and armchair Bok naysayers have colonised Keo…

  • 74.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @quotas_sux(quota_conrad_jantjies_is_jorrie_muller)-67: hy is nie van mitchellsplain nie doos :D

  • 75.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @Heavens Game(Heavens Game)-73: nee fok, hier kom kak!

  • 76.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    I fancy the Aussies for a win this weekend.

    Not only do they have a good chance on home turf they are better sports on the paddock.

    Go Aus!

  • 77.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    @Heavens Game(Heavens Game)-76: There will also be no sheepshagger partiality from evil leprechaun refs in the back pocket. Quite plainly John O’Neill woul not countenance any of Paddy OBriens shenanigans. full stop.

  • 78.quotas_sux: Reply to this comment

    transform .. nee, wie het gese hy doen, hy doen net sy drugs en crime daar

  • 79.David: Reply to this comment

    So now PdeV doesn’t appreciate a fetcher after selecting Ratel? The main reason he went with Flo for the tour was that Flo and Schalk were highly effective as a combo in the S14, especially at working the new law interpretations.
    What happened in NZ was that the ABs had worked out a way to nullify their tactic and prevent Flo from getting to the ball. He wasn’t helped by the refs interpretations either. The point is that the SA coaches didn’t have another fetcher option available and in order to combat the Aussies tried a different tactic with what was available.

  • 80.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @quotas_sux(quota_conrad_jantjies_is_jorrie_muller)-78: hehehe jy praat net klomp kak :D jdj is ‘n moerse gooie speler en jy weet ;)

  • 81.Bok fan: Reply to this comment

    @David(David)-79: If you recall Brussow was only brought in after Schalk was suspended (A suspension which won us the series in my opinion) and not at the start of the season like he should have been.

    Fair enough regarding your comment on Schalk and Flo but after the first test with Bakkies sent home, the first thing Pdv should have done was send a genuine fetcher like Stegman over to balance the loose trio?

  • 82.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-75: What kak! I am pinpointing AB preciousness way before it starts pi.ssing the rest of Bok supporters.

    I know how AB supporters think: Contrary to all this facade about “rivalry” and “respect” the sheepshaggers don’t respect Bok rugby and they have more of a rivalry with the Wallabies (Bledisloe cup). We are the poor cousins in 3N from their POV. Plainly.

    Memories of all their bullshyte have been blurre by recent success of the Boks. Time to start remembering…

  • 83.Rugby-1: Reply to this comment

    @David(David)-79:

    Well why go with 1 fetcher and how many centres? The squad selection was poor, we should have had options with the depth we have but we didn’t and ended up playing a tactic against the Aussies that 90% of fans and commentators knew was wrong – but hey apparently that’s okay because had to make do with what we had. How unprofessional

  • 84.rossoneri: Reply to this comment

    @quotas_sux(quota_conrad_jantjies_is_jorrie_muller)-78: So. You are from PE. Where in PE are you? Forrest Hill Shebeen?

  • 85.Yetirat: Reply to this comment

    At least we know the breakdown calls will be reasonable with Craig Joubert at the whistle. Certainly better than some of the NH rookies we’ve had to deal with.

  • 86.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @David(David)-79: it worked in ’08 at ellis park when div played burger, spies & smith against waugh, elsom & palu (waugh was replaced by george smith) 53 – 8

  • 87.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @Bok fan(Bok fan)-81: schalk didn’t play the 1st match because of a calf injury…

  • 88.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @Yetirat(Yetirat)-85: craig joubert watched boots ‘n all, he knows he must nail mcCaw or Keo will slate him in business day come monday! :D

  • 89.Dawn: Reply to this comment

    @rossoneri(rossoneri)-84:

    Just ignore the twat.

  • 90.Bok fan: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-87: Then how did he manage to gauge the guys eye??

  • 91.SAussie/QldRed: Reply to this comment

    one day to go boys and girls, The kiwi’s have a spring in their step and are confident, that’s good to see. The wallabies have been given a hammering in the press for not going on the job so expect 80 mins of high octane play. I feel that the Wallabies are a lot more settled this year, good scrum, good line out, Genia is majic, Burgess was **** last year and I think really cost us. This game will depend on the who wins the breakdown and if the S14 is any judge Jourbet will be hard on teams who deliberatly kill the ball. If McCaw gets 10 mins cooling off then its really game on because he won’t push it again. They can do it but they need to turn up, I just have a feeling they will. Can’t predict the score

  • 92.Gonzo Journalism: Reply to this comment

    Dis Naweek !!!! kom ons fo%&&^n duik

  • 93.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    @Yetirat(Yetirat)-85: Even Craig Joubert is better than some of the oirish excuses for leprechaun refs that have been on show in tokoloshe land…

  • 94.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @Bok fan(Bok fan)-90: only @ loftus, 1st Test was in Durban :roll:

  • 95.gunther: Reply to this comment

    I love the smell of whining in the morning.

  • 96.Yetirat: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-88:

    Haha :)

    Many have felt the wrath of the Keo’s business day column!

  • 97.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    @Yetirat(Yetirat)-96: Business day is definitely not the Economist…

  • 98.grant10: Reply to this comment

    Keo….if you write such rubbish in your weekly newsletter please take me off your mailing list.

    You are becoming as soft and accomodating as the average saffa brainless moronic, candy floss, feeble minded, limp wristed mommas boys.

    If Plod is not good enough, then he in not good enough. Giving caps away for ‘the occassion ‘ is sick and weak.

    You can continue with the ‘Fat Boys Club’, together with the slapgat back slappers.

    Its WP nd Vasco Da Gama Football Club for me.

    I wont be hoodwinked or sugar coated into believing or buying into the rabble currently parading as the national team….

    Klaar.

  • 99.quotas_sux: Reply to this comment

    801. grant10 :
    November 15th, 2009 at 8:08 am
    #792 Real Deal: Korean vet man….screw you wally….you reckon its okay for a Bok captain to denigrate a fellow Bok in a book it shows up your lack of moral fibre….actually expected a bit more from a traditionalist like you….seems you okay with this as long as Smit is climbing into Luke.

    Hypocrite….go back to Korea….The new SA dont need your kind here.

    so thats my grant doesn’t like JS … its all about the cancer puke

  • 100.grant10: Reply to this comment

    @quotas_sux(quota_conrad_jantjies_is_jorrie_muller)-99: yes….partly true.

    Fact that he is out of shape and playing the poorest rugby i have ever seen from him certainly adds to my hoping Plod retires.

  • 101.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    @grant10(grant10)-98: I thank the creator everyday that Puke is as far away from the Bok setup as possible…

    Puke in Bath forever!!!, Please!!!

    The Boks will then be safe…

    Also, a request for you to take tricky dicky on one of your regular dolphin watching/dancing forays where hopely he mistakes a great white as one…

    The Boks and Captain Barney, your Captain, will be as safe as possible and back to high performance…

  • 102.David: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-86:
    Yeah, it did, although I think the combo against the Aussies last week was the wrong one, given the choices available. If they wanted to change I’d have played Pottie somewhere and dropped one of the other three. Sometimes coaches get it wrong and the opposing coach gets it right. I remember the ABs last year playing Kaino at 8 and Rodney at 7, when they’d played in the opposite positions the year before. Isaac Ross was also a mistake.

  • 103.quotas_sux: Reply to this comment

    grant, i agree js is p!ss poor ..always has been, but just 1 question, wasn’t Teichmann also off form when he was dropped? And aterwards everyone called “rape”

  • 104.grant10: Reply to this comment

    @Heavens Game(Heavens Game)-101: well i am thrilled that you are happy and content with Plod….

    You may rue your shortsighted acceptance and accomodation of the Michelin Man come 2011 when we head home in the quarter finals…..

    But what can i say….strangest thing is i never saw you as being so forgiving of such mediocrity.

  • 105.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    @quotas_sux(quota_conrad_jantjies_is_jorrie_muller)-99: No – have to disagree, its all about grant the liberator of the “New SA”…

  • 106.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    @grant10(grant10)-104: Barney is not mediocre… Answer me this: Have the scrums and lineouts been a problem in the last few tests?

  • 107.David: Reply to this comment

    With most of the bloggers here concentrating on their perfect WC squad, has anyone bothered to look at the current problems we face for the next 3 matches?
    Victor is out on his feet with Bekker out for the year and Hargreaves (the apparent next in line 5) injured.
    Bakkies out and Danie running on empty with only a green, young 4 in reserve.
    Ratel and Steggies out.
    Smith still needing a couple of games to get back to test fitness.
    I think this shows that we need to keep blooding new players as if this happens prior to the WC we’re in serious trouble.

  • 108.grant10: Reply to this comment

    @Heavens Game(Heavens Game)-106: scrums were the only stable aspect of Boks play. Perhaps Plod had a role there ….although i do feel it was the fact we played with actual tightheads as opposed to a bloated hooker masquerading as the anchor of the bok scrum.

    Plod missed some crucial lineouts, the 1 which resulted in a Aussie try just before half time that buried Boks.
    And for goodness sake, the lineouts should always be virtually 100 % with that aspect being a bok strength.

    Plod was dismal, not hitting rucks, not makin tackles and generally being miles off the pace compared to the kiwi and aussie hookers.

    Sorry HG….you can spin this all day long….you know it…i know it….Plod is the on the Nowhereville Road that leads to Palookaville.

  • 109.Rugby-1: Reply to this comment

    Regardless of anyones opinions over John Smit, it’s really hard to take anyone who cries out for Luke Watson to come back into the Bok squad seriously!

    David – yep we have some serious problems with injuries and fatigue right now, be interesting to see who is available for the test at Soccer City. Time to blood some young form players

  • 110.grant10: Reply to this comment

    @David(David)-107: I look forward to Juandre Kruger performance tomorrow….he may be the man to back up Matfield once he finds his feet here.

  • 111.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @Heavens Game(Heavens Game)-106: the lineouts were sh*t Barney himself conceded! What games were you watching France? :roll:

  • 112.grant10: Reply to this comment

    LW would be far better than Spies on current form….thats for damn sure.

    Even JW says he would have LW as his captain…..how bloody ironic.

  • 113.grant10: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-111:
    ja

    1 st test we lost 4 balls…in 1 st half!!

  • 114.RedMan: Reply to this comment

    @grant10(grant10)-98: There is an ‘unsubscribe’ option at the end of the newsletter.

    That might be easier

  • 115.grant10: Reply to this comment

    @RedMan(RedMan)-114: thanks…

    missed it

  • 116.Rugby-1: Reply to this comment

    @grant10(grant10)-112:

    Jake White would say anyting right now to get the Bok coach position so I would take that with a bucket of salt.

    And no I think Luke would battle to make the top 10 loosies in SA. I do agree with your comments on Juandre Kruger, seriosu potential there and may get a look in for the Boks sooner than later. See you’re finally talking sense :-)

  • 117.foreverrugga: Reply to this comment

    “the Wallabies landed a blow that sent the Springboks down to the Tri-Nations canvas. They were rougher, tougher and ultimately smarter”….. ja right, you try playing with a blind ref and for 20 minutes with only 14 men.

  • 118.foreverrugga: Reply to this comment

    @grant10(grant10)-112: stop being a bum licker man, now you really talking sh.i.t.

  • 119.Flametop: Reply to this comment

    Step right up, step right up place your bets…..
    3-1 on Richie getting the first card, 2-1 on Pocock.
    Don’t miss out.

  • 120.foreverrugga: Reply to this comment

    @Flametop(Flametop)-119: richie a yellow card…haha, do think any ref would dare give richie a yellow card?

  • 121.TheTackler: Reply to this comment

    Asked which trophy was more important, he (McCaw) didn’t have much hesitation in saying:

    “I think the Bledisloe probably edges ahead but if you get the Bledisloe there’s a fair chance you have the other one (3N) as well.

  • 122.David: Reply to this comment

    I’m beginning to wonder how much the B&IL tour has interfered with PdeVs WC planning. A lot of the senior 2007 WC players stayed on for it and then decided to continue for the next WC. In some ways I reckon it would have been easier for PdeV if he’d started to build a new squad and implement his own style and game game plan when he first took over. To some extent his tenure has been a bit of a compromise between the JW approach favoured by his senior players and his own concept of what he wants.

  • 123.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @David(David)-122: he had no time to faff around when the lions came calling he had to win! So he abandoned his running rugby philosophy @ the alter or history & results! Imagine being known as the coach that lost 3 – zip to the lions playing ur prefered style of rugby :roll:

  • 124.Flametop: Reply to this comment

    @TheTackler(TheTackler)-121:

    And if you beat France….ah wait…

  • 125.Flametop: Reply to this comment

    @foreverrugga(foreverrugga)-120:

    Most refs probably don’t know Richie is even playing, let alone card him.

    Pocock is the new apprentice

  • 126.David: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-123:
    I agree, which is why I said that that tour probably interfered. He was on a hiding to nothing.

  • 127.goyougoodthing2: Reply to this comment

    @David(David)-122: You blaming the LIONS now for Div?

    WTF?

  • 128.willievz: Reply to this comment

    @David(David)-122: Very true. But then again – if you had all these world beaters at your disposal, wouldn’t you be tempted to squeeze the last bit of international rugby out of them?

    Especially when a significant majority of them would still be under 30 at the next WC?

    Of course, the buzz word here is “management”.

    One should look at practical examples of good and poor player management in sporting codes to see our current dilemma in perspective and to look for solutions.

    The dynastic Australian cricket team of the 2000s held onto their resources in similar fashion, and experienced major if temporary setbacks with the piecemeal retirement of traditional stalwarts.

    Of course, comparing cricket resources to its sister sport rugby is like comparing apples with pears, as players have a greater longeivity in the game where leather challenges willow.

    But there are some lessons to be learned from their strategies, particularly in identifying a core group of players out of these world beaters to form the foundation of a future challenge. They managed to succeed in strategic planning with limited resources, while the English WC winning team in 2003 failed to make their labour push the frontier further out.

    We have identified Smit, Matfield and FDP in 2007 to form the backbone of a WC defense leadership in 2011. We also assumed that most of the rest of the team would be available in 2011.

    In hindsight, were those the right choices? Or rather, were those the realistic choices? And more importantly, were we complacent in our medium- to long-term planning to ensure their availability?

    We are now struggling with the issue of fatigue, more than we ever thought we would. I guess that we have identified the core group of players correctly, but lack the strategic acumen in managing them. We are not engaging on the Australian cricket trajectory, but on a stagnating English rugby one.

    The means we are applying to achieve the end goal of a back-to-back WC triumph is suspect, and reminds me of the trajectory of the English WC winning team.

    I will conclude by reminding you that PDV was under more pressure than JW to also improve on the win % ratio instead of focusing merely on WC triumph. This obviously had implications for his team selection(s).

  • 129.David: Reply to this comment

    @goyougoodthing2(goyougoodthing2)-127:
    What do you mean, “blame the Lions tour for Div”?

    What I was getting at is that because of the importance of winning that tour it may have curtailed his long term plans.

  • 130.David: Reply to this comment

    @willievz(willievz)-128:
    That’s basically what I was getting at. :lol:
    There was also another factor, though, and that was PdeVs idea of approach and the resistance by the senior players which would take time to change, something he didn’t have the luxury of with the B&IL tour coming so soon. Generally change is evolutionary if managed intelligently, but this wasn’t possible in time for the Lions, as his first season showed.

  • 131.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @willievz(willievz)-128: re this whole ‘management’ issue i blame pdv when it comes to last year’s eoyt, Plod, fdp & matfield had no business going on that tour whatsoever! Especially when pdv himself was saying the players are tired – even mentally – but still HE succumbed to their demand that they want to cap a very successful year by beating their hoodoo teams france & ireland, we all know how that turned out!

    Imagine if the nucleus of the team that played against wales this year – without the stupid selections of raubenheimer and the rest – had all those games last year to test their mettle in europe!

    Lost opportunity!

  • 132.heboric: Reply to this comment

    @TheTackler(TheTackler)-121:

    So if Reechie says to you to “Jump off a cliff”, will you respond like a lemming.

  • 133.TheBoksAreBack: Reply to this comment

    Has PdV called up Frans Steyn yet?!!!!

    Arse-wipe

  • 134.willievz: Reply to this comment

    @David(David)-130: For sure.

    So this is how I (and I am sure you too) see it:

    A Sanzar team playing the Lions in between WCs would really only have two years to build for a WC, commencing only after a Lions tour, because it will take two years after a WC to prepare for the Lions.

    Whereas other teams can build for a WC in a 4-year time window.

  • 135.willievz: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-131: That EOYT was a lost opportunity. They merely selected a bunch of individual players without thinking about combinations.

  • 136.Yetirat: Reply to this comment

    @David(David)-122:

    That’s what’s so tragic about all of this. He compromised on his own vision to please others and now it’s come back to bite him in the ***, and all those people he tried to appease though compromise have got the knives out.

  • 137.David: Reply to this comment

    @Yetirat(Yetirat)-136:
    That’s the difference with a manager like Sir Alec Fergusen. No player is more important than the team. He’s the boss. PdeV was considered as almost a caretaker of an existing squad.

  • 138.goyougoodthing2: Reply to this comment

    @David(David)-130: See here is where I think Div out-thought himself.

    On one side he decided to recall Smit to enable him to manage a team that perhaps was not going to buy in to his ideas at all.

    Smit wanted to return so it seemed to work out fine.

    The flipside is: Smit has a sell-by date and we Div hasn’t identified a new Captian in his place (Chiliboy is not senior enough to be Captain).

    And it seems Smit, just like the rest of the seniors, wants to play their own game.

    Div has dug himself a large hole, one which you can’t blame on other people. He had an opportunity to sweep it clean, instead he relied on structures already in place.

    I agree he couldn’t win BUT he took the job. I would have left Smit in France.

  • 139.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @Yetirat(Yetirat)-136: and jake is conviniently musing out loud in the media “i can’t help but wonder how far the team would’ve progressed if i like graham hery was allowed to carry on” :roll:

  • 140.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @goyougoodthing2(goyougoodthing2)-138: leave Plod in France when apparently 80% of the players wanted Heineken Meyer as the coach? fdp was ready to bounce – he said it himself -, vic was @ Toulon, Bakkies wa itching to follow suit. SA Media would’ve eaten pdv alive. Rock & a hard place

  • 141.mshiniwami: Reply to this comment

    @David(David)-107:

    IMO best team for next 3 games

    -3 week rest will help the likes of Matfield recharge
    -Rossouw has never played a full season bar this yr,dont think he is running on empty.Missed most of first game in 3N as well,plus shared time with Flip in S14.

    My team for next 3 games

    1.Guthro
    2.Smit(c)
    3.BJ
    4.Rossouw
    5.Matfield
    6.Burger
    7.Smith
    8.Potgieter

    9.Pienaar
    10.Steyn
    11.Habana
    12.De Villiers
    13.De Jongh
    14.JPP
    15.Aplon

    16.Bismark
    17.Beast
    18.Flip
    19.Spies/Louw
    20.Hougaard
    21.Butch
    22.Basson/Kirchner

  • 142.Corndog: Reply to this comment

    I think we should blood the youngsters in the next 3 games. We have nothing left to loose.

    IMO BJ and CJ have not been the saviours the hype boys have made them out to be. Using the current squad I would pick the following guys to rest key players and shake things up:

    1. Guthro
    2. Chilli
    3. Smit (He is still carrying the weight he put on as a prop and would have played here if Bismarck was fit anyway)
    4. Russouw
    5. Vd Merwe (Bekker injured and we might need more bulk at the rucks also gives Matfield a rest)
    6. FLouw/Potgieter
    7. Smith
    8. Burger
    9. Hougaard
    10. Pienaar/James
    11. Habana
    12. JdV
    13. JdJ
    14. Aplon
    15. Kirchner

  • 143.grant10: Reply to this comment

    @mshiniwami(mshiniwami)-141: How on earth can you justify Plods inclusion.

    It defies belief!

  • 144.goyougoodthing2: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-140: Well kinda tells you they chose the wrong guy then.

    If fingers are to be pointed, point them at the politicians.

    Div may be a bunch of things, and I don’t particularly think he is the man for the job BUT

    I have to acknowledge the guy was hung out to dry.

    Firstly the appoint him, then they leave him to make a fool of himself. I have a feeling that the guys were so cross at having to appoint BEE that they did and then left him to it. Basically without any help it’s a big set of shoes to fill and his mouth seems to run on auto. No guidance, no PR secretary, no help.

    Basically seemed like a big f-you to everyone from SARU.

    Not sure I would have acted differently though.

    The appointment of DIV was the beginning of the end though, bu bringing back a few guys he managed to keep it going for 2 years and good on him, but it’s over.

    Call them the Proteas and be done with it.

  • 145.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-139:

    “Allowed to carry on”.

    As I recall, he’s the one who didn’t re-apply for the position once his contract expired…

  • 146.grant10: Reply to this comment

    @Corndog(Corndog)-142: oh my word…..

    The inmates are running the asylum!

    Smit at 3?

    After he admitted to being scared for his own safety?

    Even i, who dont like the oke, would not subject him to that punishment!

  • 147.rossoneri: Reply to this comment

    Rugby | Springboks

    Peter de Villiers © Gallo Images

    I am in charge – Div

    ——————————————————————————–

    by Brenden Nel 30/07/2010, 08:56

    Springbok coach Peter de Villiers has come out strongly to tell the country that he — and nobody else — is the coach of the national team.

    After several articles which suggest that De Villiers was not in control of the World Champions but it was either run by senior players, or by the assistant coaches, the Bok mentor moved swiftly to dispel any doubts about who is in charge.

    De Villiers faced up to fans questions in SA Rugby’s Bokzine — the email newsletter for Springbok fans — and was forthright when asked who is in charge of the team.

    “I’ve heard this so many times — and not just in New Zealand — that it’s obvious that those with fixed opinions won’t change their minds whatever I say,” De Villiers wrote.

    “I am the coach but I do listen to players who have played in close to 100 tests and won every trophy there is to win in rugby. It has brought us success and I don’t recall this being a criticism last year. I am not threatened by this talk — after all, I went to France to fetch John (Smit) back.

    When confronted by the question of bringing in young talent and the suggestion that some of the senior players have past their prime, the Bok coach pointed out that experience was a telling factor when it came to the World Cup.

    “One of the key questions that we spend a long time debating in selection and this year you’ve seen that we have brought through young players like Francois Louw, Juan de Jongh, Flip van der Merwe and others,” De Villiers explained.

    “But the history of World Cups is that they’re won by experience — the Bok and England teams that won the last two were the most experienced in either teams’ rugby history! All but three of Jake’s team won in 2007 had made their debuts at or before the previous World Cup, so experience can’t be a bad thing.”

    De Villiers added that utility back Frans Steyn’s cannon boot was very much still in the Bok plans, but suggested his commitments to his French club Racing Metro were hindering him from playing for the national team.

    “In answer, Frans is very much still in our thinking and we would like him in the team — we just have to balance the demands of club and country so that he can perform his best for the Springboks,” De Villiers said.

  • 148.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    @goyougoodthing2(goyougoodthing2)-144:

    Booked your plane ticket for Australia yet, then?

  • 149.Corndog: Reply to this comment

    @grant10(grant10)-146: Who else to play at 3 has BJ or CJ done anything of significance since being back in the fold?

    IMO Smit would have played @ 3 this season was it not for Bismarck’s injury. I for one feel sorry for him, he is asked to bulk up to play prop and is now hammered in the media for being off the pace as a hooker.

  • 150.Diontnz: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-57: wow,…that’s some really great insights there…you should become a journo yourself…!

  • 151.IOU: Reply to this comment

    Kan iemand hier vir my se of die Bulle
    al ooit teen die All Blacks gespeel het
    op Loftes, en wat was die score???

  • 152.Corndog: Reply to this comment

    @goyougoodthing2(goyougoodthing2)-144: This coach has however raised the bar. Gone are the days where we go to NZ and are content with losing by a couple of points.

    We have lost at home to 2 of the strongest teams in World rugby and now everyone wants his head. I don’t think PdV has been hung out to dry as much as him being measured against a different set of expectations.

  • 153.Diontnz: Reply to this comment

    @Diontnz(Diontnz)-150: @Diontnz(Diontnz)-150: oh adam freir wrote it…oops

  • 154.goyougoodthing2: Reply to this comment

    @WP Till I Die(WP-Forever)-148: I don’t want to go to Australia but I also want to tell the truth.

    I’m not putting my head in the sand like the rest of you muppets in case someone calls me a racist, or defeatist, or traitor.

    Ignoring it won’t make it any better.

  • 155.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    @Corndog(Corndog)-152:

    JJ Harmse of all people wrote a brilliant piece in which he compared Jake White and Peter de Villiers at similar times in their coaching careers.

    2006 was a watershed year for White; will the same hold true for de Villiers?

  • 156.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    @goyougoodthing2(goyougoodthing2)-154:

    Fair enough.

  • 157.goyougoodthing2: Reply to this comment

    @Corndog(Corndog)-152: Dude I don;t like Div and don’t think he should have the job. Neither should Muir or Gold or Smit.

    Div is arrogant like all people in jobs for which they are not qualified.

  • 158.IOU: Reply to this comment

    Kan iemand hier vir my se of die Bulle
    al ooit teen die All Blacks gespeel het
    op Loftes, en wat was die score???

  • 159.goyougoodthing2: Reply to this comment

    @WP Till I Die(WP-Forever)-156: :-)

  • 160.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    @IOU(IOU)-158:

    Dink nie so nie – ek kan net dink aan die NZ Cavaliers wat Noord-Transvaal op Loftus gespeel het in 1986, die Cavaliers het 10-9 gewen.

  • 161.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    @WP Till I Die(WP-Forever)-160:

    Mind you, the Cavaliers side that toured in 1986 was basically an All Black team – I think 28 of the 30 who toured with the Cavaliers were All Blacks before that.

  • 162.Corndog: Reply to this comment

    @IOU(IOU)-158: Sorry kan nie help nie. Maar dit sal seker voor die isolasie periode gewees het.

    @goyougoodthing2(goyougoodthing2)-157: Whether you like an individual or not does not determine the standards against which the person should be judged.

    I have never heard of a coaches head being called for due to losing against 2 of the worlds best sides in there own back yards. Until 2 years ago the idea of beating the All Blacks in New Zealand was a pipe dream, now we have done it 2 years in a row, hence the bar being set higher than ever before.

    We have been outthought by AB’s and Aus this year after we did it to them last year. They have raised the bar and it is up to us to repsond.

  • 163.IOU: Reply to this comment

    @WP Till I Die(WP-Forever)-160:
    Baie dankie vir die reply!

  • 164.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    @WP Till I Die(WP-Forever)-160:

    En ja, daai was die wedstryd wat daai lae skurk Burger Geldenhuys vir Andy Dalton se kakebaan afgeslaan het.

  • 165.goyougoodthing2: Reply to this comment

    @Corndog(Corndog)-162: Our coach is a muppet, like him or not.

    Dude you can’t seriously consider Div as the best man for the job. His selections in the positions of Assistant Coaches should be enough to show you he doesn’t have either the intelligence to hire the right guys, or he is too arrogant to surround himself with clever people.

    Either answer is not good enough. Do you think Branson or Trump are brain surgeons? No they are not but they hire brain surgeons on their teams.

  • 166.goyougoodthing2: Reply to this comment

    @WP Till I Die(WP-Forever)-161: I remember that tour as I was in NZ at the time.

    The anti-apartheid activists wanted to kill us ‘Seth Effrican’s’ who lived there. They also wanted to kill the Cavaliers.

    It was sad. Rugby vs non-rugby in the same house.

  • 167.kwas: Reply to this comment

    If Aussies take this one, then it will give the Boks something to play for in the home leg other than just pride. Go the Wobblies!

  • 168.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    @goyougoodthing2(goyougoodthing2)-166:

    Yes, there were rumours about payments under the table to the All Black players to go on tour.

    I think none of them were selected for the All Blacks for a few Tests after they returned, as a form of punishment.

  • 169.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @Diontnz(Diontnz)-150: as it says at the top, adam freier wrote it and i’m definitely not aussie!

  • 170.goyougoodthing2: Reply to this comment

    @WP Till I Die(WP-Forever)-168: They were not allowed to play for the Abs after that.

    The NZRU have done some dumb things over the years, like banning Stu Wilson and Bernie Fraser for writing a book (Ebony & Ivory) and getting PAID!!

    Shock horror (like the Boks were never paid LOL.)

  • 171.Corndog: Reply to this comment

    @goyougoodthing2(goyougoodthing2)-165: In 2004 when Jake was appointed there were a few eyebrows raised. I think there were some good provincial coaches that were overlooked.

    I agree that PdV was not the person with the best provincial record as Meyer was, but he had similar credentials to JW.

    You have your opinion and I have mine. Neither of us are going to change our minds on a Friday afternoon. And these things have been debated at lenght by people that know a lot more than we do.

    You can’t deny that his results have been up there with the best coaches since re-admission though

  • 172.Corndog: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-169: Is he not the guy that plays hooker for one of the S14 Aussie franchises. He is very well versed for a hooker.

  • 173.BOKKECOACH: Reply to this comment

    just give snorre a PR MANAGER so they can keep him out of tthe media!

  • 174.goyougoodthing2: Reply to this comment

    @Corndog(Corndog)-171: I agree to disagree.

    I would just like to see some results that are positive (not even score-wise but in attitude).

    I would seriously do away with Smit and Muir though.

    Anyway, as you say, we won’t change anything.

  • 175.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @Corndog(Corndog)-172: um, yeah. If you read the piece he says even he himself got the fire burning up his bum when tatafu polota-nau got to the tahs, competition is good! Which is the opposite here in south africa, john smit knows, he could be as kak as earl rose he will still be picked because of his mythical leadership aura that this springboks team of professional player can’t play without!

    Apprently without Smit the bokke become like the u12 of skopskietfontein pre-primary school

  • 176.Panzer Chief: Reply to this comment

    “Neither Giteau nor Berrick Barnes are known for their abilities to take on the defence……….”

    JC………
    Do you have a white cane?
    and a quide dog?

  • 177.Jibodienie: Reply to this comment

    AB’s to win all their games if they stay constant in selection.

  • 178.Corndog: Reply to this comment

    @goyougoodthing2(goyougoodthing2)-174: ave to agree with you on Muir he does not inspire confidence.

    A win would be nice, but I think we should write this year off and brand some youngsters, similar to the 3N prior to the ’07 WC. We have a lot of talent but they are short on experience, we can build at home and on the NH tour this year and have a much larger pool to pick from in 2011.

  • 179.Corndog: Reply to this comment

    @Panzer Chief(cane)-176: Also saw the comment on Giteau. Not sure what was being smoked when the article was written.

  • 180.BOKKECOACH: Reply to this comment

    agree

    team for rest of 3n

    1.beast
    2.botha/liebenberg
    3.kruger
    4.flip
    5.roussouw/skeate
    6.louw
    7.potgieter
    8.daniels
    9.houghaard
    10.jl potgieter
    11.vd heever
    12.jdejong
    13.fourie/lambie
    14.aplon
    15.f steyn

  • 181.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @Corndog(Corndog)-178: since when didn’t muir inspire confidence? He nearly won the s14 with the sharks the year before he became pdv’s assistant, what was kak about that achievement? If it wasn’t for that drunk steve walsh or that poephol frans steyn the sharks would’ve been champs and relegate heyneke meyer to an also-ran!

  • 182.Panzer Chief: Reply to this comment

    @Corndog(Corndog)-179:

    I see on Keo’s “Poll”………..65% of Keo’s Faithfull think the Wallabies will win by 15 points or more.

    8)

  • 183.BOKKECOACH: Reply to this comment

    or a team with nothing to loose to break aussies in half

    1.wp nel
    2.schalk brits
    3.jaco engels
    4.bakkies
    5.johan muller
    6. wicus van heerden
    7. baywatch
    8. luke watson
    9. kocket
    10. butch
    11. akona
    12. de wet barry
    13. jp nel
    14. meyer bosman
    15. jaco vd westhuizen

    with an irish ref 7 yellows in 1st half but cooper in hospital hahaha joke….

  • 184.Panzer Chief: Reply to this comment

    @WP Till I Die(WP-Forever)-168:

    $100,000 each Cavalier.

    Paid by some SA Newspaper.

    Thirty pieces of silver.

  • 185.David: Reply to this comment

    @Panzer Chief(cane)-184:
    That’s a bit more than 30 pieces of silver.

  • 186.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    @Panzer Chief(cane)-184:

    New Zealand Dollars?

  • 187.goyougoodthing2: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-181: Put it this way mate, not many Sharks shed a tear when Muir left.

  • 188.Panzer Chief: Reply to this comment

    @David(David)-185:

    Matthew 27.3

  • 189.Johnny7: Reply to this comment

    @goyougoodthing2(goyougoodthing2)-165: Steady now, we all know muir is good and I can’t say I’m in a position to comment on the rest of his panel, BUT

    The real shocker is his team selection.

    People, his head is not being called for just because of two games?!

    His head is being called for:
    - His consistently poor team selections.
    - A piss poor end of year tour.
    - Being handed the two teams that contested the S14 final and
    then some more good international players for good measure
    and then delivering a team that can barely seem to wipe it’s own arse in a coherent fashion.
    - Oh, and his magnificent displays of intelligence and maturity when corresponding with the media.

    Still think this is all just a knee-jerk reaction?!

  • 190.goyougoodthing2: Reply to this comment

    @Johnny7(Johnny7)-189: Muir is rubbish. Don;t think he’s a good coach and as a person he’s not my favourite either, but that’s another isssue.

    Div and his selections are awful, from Captain to positional changes to Muir, Gold and the rest in between.

  • 191.Johnny7: Reply to this comment

    @Panzer Chief(cane)-176: Think we should try and raise some money for a guide dog for JC…

  • 192.Johnny7: Reply to this comment

    @goyougoodthing2(goyougoodthing2)-190: Come on, Muir took the Sharks to the S14 final, was only walsh and/or francois steyn kicking out between him and winning the S14.

  • 193.Panzer Chief: Reply to this comment

    @WP Till I Die(WP-Forever)-186:

    yes NZ$.

    Probably around US$80,000 at that time.

    Enough to purchase, a very, very, nice suburban homes in NZ at the time.

    Not bad money for a Railway Worker, like Scott Crichton. Enough to tempt many a battler.

  • 194.goyougoodthing2: Reply to this comment

    @Johnny7(Johnny7)-192: Mate you’re not going to change my mind on Muir. Ever.

    Don’t like his coaching style, don’t like him period.

    I have zero time for the guy, he has no moral compass.

    :-)

  • 195.goyougoodthing2: Reply to this comment

    Does anyone else find these pop-up corner ads a pain in the arrssshole!!!!!!

  • 196.Panzer Chief: Reply to this comment

    @Johnny7(Johnny7)-191:

    It might be easier/cheaper, just to chop JC’s fingers off.

    That should put an end to this kind of reckless typing.

    8)

  • 197.BULLET: Reply to this comment

    Well at least the Boks cannot loose this weekend.

  • 198.Dawn: Reply to this comment

    Did someone mention chopping off fingers?

  • 199.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @goyougoodthing2(goyougoodthing2)-194: sharks supporter? :razz:

  • 200.goyougoodthing2: Reply to this comment

    @BULLET(BULLET)-197: loose is like a pair of trousers that fall off.

    Lose is to not win, to be beaten.

  • 201.goyougoodthing2: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-199: heh yeah I am.

    Seen the guy around town. So I know what he gets up to. Not nice.

  • 202.Johnny7: Reply to this comment

    @goyougoodthing2(goyougoodthing2)-195: mmm.. I think everyone is pissed off about that one.

    @Panzer Chief(cane)-196: While we’re at it, can we also chop the fingers off of whoever it was that stuck that bloody irritating ad at the bottom of the page?

  • 203.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @goyougoodthing2(goyougoodthing2)-200: are you the new TheTackler?

  • 204.goyougoodthing2: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-203: No, I’m not the new ‘TheTackler’ (remember your inverted commas). ;-)

  • 205.cab: Reply to this comment

    Yeah dodgy old SA, that cavaliers tour was another disgrace, having to buy off players, but must admit I loved that tour, all the years they had not played

    pity some of the boneheads did not wake up sooner, then again we never got to see the worlds best flanker on that tour,michael jones. Can’t remember if Maori fellas on tour or if our horseshit policy still applied.

  • 206.goyougoodthing2: Reply to this comment

    What an idiot Gold is:

    Springbok assistant coach Gary Gold has broken his silence, admitting that the away leg of this year’s Vodacom Tri Nations was a failure, but vowed the coaching staff would work tirelessly to make the home leg a success.

    Gold admitted in his online blog at rugbyiq.com that the Boks had executed their game plan poorly, but took another dig at referees by implying the difference between Super 14 and Tri Nations success was refereeing from the Northern Hemisphere. He also refused to believe the Bok game plan was outdated or old fashioned, as some critics have claimed.

    “To say that the tour was not a success would be the understatement of the year. And while many of you rugby supporters are understandably annoyed and irritated with the team’s performances, it is our responsibility – and job – to not get caught up in a wave of emotion but, rather, objectively and systematically go about fixing the problem. Something which Peter de Villiers, as the head coach, is very good at doing,” Gold wrote.

    “I believe that the cardinal rule about learning from our losses is that we need to focus our time and attention on the issues that we can control – in so doing we need to be honest and harsh about the things that we have done wrong; as an entire group. That said, I truly believe whilst there certainly were other external factors that aided our poor performances, spending time moaning and deliberating over these issues is counter-productive and takes our focus away from fixing the areas of our game that we can control.

    Gold added that while it was a popular view at the moment that the Boks kicked too much while in New Zealand, the match statistics show that the All Blacks actually kicked more than the Boks.

    “However, what is unquestionable is that their kicks – in their intentions and execution – were all superior to those of ours. Their kicks were on target more often and their chase was aggressive and accurate; in fact, their entire kicking strategy put us under similar pressure to what we did to them last year.

    “You see, friends, what is really important is that we get to the bottom of whether our intended strategy and plan is wrong, as is widely report, or simply our execution. I believe the latter.

    “Our kicks were generally inaccurate, we chased and aligned poorly and then failed on far too many occasions to make the first-time tackle intended to pin them deep in their own 22 – which, of course, exerts pressure and hopefully leads to turnovers. That is why I firmly believe, and clearly like NZ do, that the strategy is good – but on this tour our execution was far below our acceptable standard.”

    Gold believes there is an irony in the claims the Boks aren’t “advancing the game” in the same way the Aussies and New Zealanders have.

    “At last November’s SANZAR conference; the Super 14 teams from Australia, New Zealand and South Africa were told in no uncertain terms that four areas of the game were going to be heavily policed and teams not adhering to the refreshed interpretations of these four areas would be heavily penalised and thus be left behind. (The area that was most significantly going to be managed, would be the breakdown – with particular attention to the defending team allowing the attacking team to generate quick ball.)

    “There is no doubt that South Africa’s Super 14 teams – through some astute coaching – adapted magnificently; an example of that is the team that conceded the most penalties in the 2010 Super 14 were the Crusaders, followed by the Hurricanes.

    “In all, the Crusaders conceded 90 penalties; of those 75 penalties were conceded whilst on defence – mainly against effecting opposition from gaining quick ball.

    “As we know, the Super 14 culminated in two SA sides meeting in the final and I am sure none of our Antipodean teams would disagree that they were the two best teams throughout the competition.

    “How then, can it be possible that a few weeks later a Springbok team – made up largely of these same players – are now being accused of not ‘keeping up’ with how the game has advanced?

    “And, here lies the irony…

    “SANZAR instructed and initiated the new law interpretations and used 17 referees – from Australia, NZ and SA only – in 99 Super Rugby matches this season. Yet, to date, not one of those 17 referees have featured in the Tri-Nations (until this weekend – with our very own Craig Joubert in charge in Melbourne).

    Gold said the team was admittedly “defenceless” when it came to their defence pattern on tour and this was something they would have to rectify.

    “This is an area we will be giving massive attention to in the coming weeks as we build up to our next game in Soweto.

    “The team has always prided itself in its strong defence and in the past that strong defence has given us a favourable reward by being able to turn over opposition ball. So, I am confident that rectify it.

    “We are a tight squad under Pete’s leadership and nobody will shirk the hard work as we look to rectify our performances. Everybody in the Bok squad is very passionate about what they do, and how they do it, and there is a great camaraderie between everyone – all of whom have one goal; Bok victories. “

  • 207.goyougoodthing2: Reply to this comment

    @cab(cab)-205: Dude I thought the Cavaliers tour was great. It showed rugby is not about politics.

  • 208.cab: Reply to this comment

    Ah **** same old same old, it’s fine to get your kicking right, but that is not why we last, we have zero attacking impetus or plan to do so and our pack is considerably off the pack of last yeear

    if they concentrate on their kicking again, even at home, the boks will get pumped again. Get the pack right and have a go with the ball in hand

  • 209.cab: Reply to this comment

    In short let Krusty work his magic, bugger this kickchase nonsense performed by lazy forwards that don’t want to committ and win hard fast giforward ball – Head Coach de Villiers must take a krusty mask to slip on before the kiwi tv postmaych interview

  • 210.grant10: Reply to this comment

    jeepers Cab

    stop talking so much sense.

    It doesent feel right agreeing with you….

  • 211.goyougoodthing2: Reply to this comment

    Gold says that the Abs kicked more than the Boks. Well you genius, if they have 80% of the possession chances are they will do more than us, but the ratio of kicks to run is different.

  • 212.cab: Reply to this comment

    Nah this kickchase has Bern **** from the word go, the reason we were successful in 2009 was a pack that took the game to a different level on terms of commitment and frenetc blitzkrieg- had buggerall to do with the stupid kicking

  • 213.Mustard: Reply to this comment

    Brenden Nel

    Johannesburg – Springbok coach Peter de Villiers has come out strongly to tell the country that he – and nobody else – is the coach of the national team.

    After several articles which suggest that De Villiers was not in control of the World Champions but it was either run by senior players, or by the assistant coaches, the Bok mentor moved swiftly to dispel any doubts about who is in charge.

    De Villiers faced up to fans questions in SA Rugby’s Bokzine – the email newsletter for Springbok fans – and was forthright when asked who is in charge of the team.

    “I’ve heard this so many times – and not just in New Zealand – that it’s obvious that those with fixed opinions won’t change their minds whatever I say,” De Villiers wrote.

    “I am the coach but I do listen to players who have played in close to 100 Tests and won every trophy there is to win in rugby. It has brought us success and I don’t recall this being a criticism last year. I am not threatened by this talk – after all, I went to France to fetch John (Smit) back.

    When confronted by the question of bringing in young talent and the suggestion that some of the senior players have past their prime, the Bok coach pointed out that experience was a telling factor when it came to the World Cup.

    “One of the key questions that we spend a long time debating in selection and this year you’ve seen that we have brought through young players like Francois Louw, Juan de Jongh, Flip van der Merwe and others,” De Villiers explained.

    “But the history of World Cups is that they’re won by experience – the Bok and England teams that won the last two were the most experienced in either teams’ rugby history! All but three of Jake’s team won in 2007 had made their debuts at or before the previous World Cup, so experience can’t be a bad thing.”

    De Villiers added that utility back Frans Steyn’s cannon boot was very much still in the Bok plans, but suggested his commitments to his French club Racing Metro were hindering him from playing for the national team.

    “In answer, Frans is very much still in our thinking and we would like him in the team – we just have to balance the demands of club and country so that he can perform his best for the Springboks,” De Villiers said.

  • 214.Mustard: Reply to this comment

    @goyougoodthing2(goyougoodthing2)-206: Just read that now.

    Gold often uses stats to back up everything he says on his blog…but im only interested in the most important stat…the Scoreboard

  • 215.Big Hit: Reply to this comment

    ‘“But the history of World Cups is that they’re won by experience – the Bok and England teams that won the last two were the most experienced in either teams’ rugby history! All but three of Jake’s team won in 2007 had made their debuts at or before the previous World Cup, so experience can’t be a bad thing.”’

    well said PDV

  • 216.TheTackler: Reply to this comment

    Peter Fitzsimons, former Wallaby prop, Sydney Morning Herald columnist and author of several books, has given 10 reasons why Australia will beat NZ in Melbourne. See what you think…

    (Peter FitzSimons has the distinction of being the only Wallaby ever sent off against the All Blacks – something of which he is absurdly and tragically proud. Here, he tells us why Australia will topple New Zealand at Etihad Stadium in Melbourne tonight.)

    1 It’s about bloody time. The Wallabies are too good a side, with too good a coach, to lose against the All Blacks EIGHT times in a row. It is against the natural order of things for a group of New Zealanders to beat a group of Australians at anything even once, and when it comes to losing at rugby that many times, surely the heavens themselves will revolt, the seas will rise, the sky fall in, before it will happen.

    2 The Wallabies are rising fast. George Bernard Shaw once said: “Wagner has some wonderful moments … but some terrible half hours!” and the same may be said of the Wallabies in the latter part of last year, and a couple of their early Tests this year. But on their last outing, against the Springboks last week, the Wallabies had a couple of wonderful half hours and only a few terrible moments. They’re on the run-in to the World Cup now, and it was always going to be around now that it all started coming together. The signs are that it is happening!

    3 The All Blacks are starting to fall away. How do I know that? Because there is no way they can possibly play better, ever, than they did against the Springboks in their past two Tests. Yes, of course they were completely devastating in those matches: rolling thunder in the forwards, lightning in the backs, all put together making a perfect storm that blew the South Africans away. But think of it mathematically. This year the All Blacks were always going to play “X” minutes of absolutely stupendous rugby. Now, we meet them at a time when there is only ”X less 320” minutes of perfect rugby left in them! There has to be some dud rugby ahead from them!

    4 Our forward pack is getting better. And I know that from similar reasoning to that above. It was not so long ago that with a collapsing scrum and a dud lineout, they simply couldn’t get any worse, meaning the only way was up – and so it has proved. In the past two Tests, particularly, the Wallabies forwards have not only been competent, they have very nearly been bloody good!

    5 Our depth. What does it say to you when we lose a player like Quade Cooper at five-eighth, and you not only have a genius the calibre of Matt Giteau to move into that position, but you get a refreshed Berrick Barnes coming off the bench?
    Ad Feedback

    6 Will Genia. The halfback was a revelation for Queensland this year, the heart and soul of the side, and he was sorely missed by the Wallabies when absent through injury at the start of the season. But he’s baaaaaaaack! He demonstrated last week just how good he is and, with that run under his belt, this week he can make a statement to take his place on the Rugby Rushmore of the Halfback Greats, beside the likes of Ken Catchpole, Nick Farr-Jones and George Gregan.

    7 We have their plans! After that photo of the piece of paper with a couple of the All Blacks moves on it was published, Robbie Deans has been no doubt up all night all week with a magnifying glass decoding the whole thing, before distributing it to the Wallabies. We’ll know what they’re going to do before they do! (Not really. That whole notion is absurd. But the more we play it up big, the more it plays with their minds.)

    8 With victory, the Wallabies will be ”moving Australia forward” and ”taking real action” all in one, so you know it’s a good idea!

    9 David Bloody Pocock. He belted the bejeesus out of the Springboks’ back row last weekend up in Brisbane and now it is the All Blacks’ turn to get their medicine. Hold still, Richie, this won’t hurt a bit. Not much, anyway.

    10 It’s simple. We’re Australians. They’re Kiwis. We’re better than they are!

  • 217.Muttonbird: Reply to this comment

    @TheTackler(TheTackler)-216: We all know Peter Fitzsimons is a sensationalist and this piece is nothing more than comedy, tongue-in-cheek, and he admits as much himself. Funny.

  • 218.Black Panther: Reply to this comment

    Superb ! Fitzsimons is one of my very favourite sports journos. Very clever, witty. His books are excellent, smart guy.

    This match can go either way. Blacks still developing, Boks were so bad that they made them look better than they are. Wallabies still developing too but have home ground advantage and Deans will have tricks up his sleeve, fer sure. ABs hold psychological advan with 7 straight wins, but theyre not good enough to expect any away victory in Aus. Great to get the African easybeats out of the way, let them return to Currie Cup and lick their wounds and egos. Soccer City can wait for another day.

    kia KAHA !

  • 219.Muttonbird: Reply to this comment

    @WP Till I Die(WP-Forever)-161:
    “Mind you, the Cavaliers side that toured in 1986 was basically an All Black team – I think 28 of the 30 who toured with the Cavaliers were All Blacks before that.” – WP

    Wrong. They were the worst of scum for breaking the sanctions and “playing” a team that represented an illegal regime. 28 of 30 were AB’s before but how many after?

  • 220.Big Hit: Reply to this comment

    @Black Panther(Black Panther)-218: Interesting preview BP but I think if we’re honest NZ are going to win. Deans’s record v NZ is something like 6-1 and I’m not convinced the Wallabies bringing anything new to the table in 2010.

  • 221.Black Panther: Reply to this comment

    @Muttonbird(Muttonbird)-219:

    The 1986 Cavaliers were selected on the form at the end of 1984. They were already geriatrics hanging on just to make 1984 (Ashworth, Axle Knight etc) so 2 years later they were completely knackered. They were, in no shape or form, representative of what an ‘All Black’ team would have been if selected instead in 1986. Less than HALF made the RWC squad the following year.

    Safas are so desperate for results again NZ. Let them believe what they want. The record since post-isolation stands at a win/loss ration of 3:1 in NZs favour. If it seems like only 3 weeks since that we were being told that at “3-0″ every year it would take only a few minutes to even up again, then thats because it was.

  • 222.Muttonbird: Reply to this comment

    @Panzer Chief(cane)-184: Disgusting!

  • 223.charo: Reply to this comment

    @Muttonbird(Muttonbird)-219:

    @Black Panther(Black Panther)-221:

    a tad bitter ‘n twisted chaps?

    chat later

    cheers

  • 224.Muttonbird: Reply to this comment

    @BULLET(BULLET)-197:
    “Well at least the Boks cannot loose this weekend.”

    Those in losing CC games can. Poor b*rstards.

  • 225.Muttonbird: Reply to this comment

    @Great White Shark(Predawn)-43:
    “The most boring thread on keo to date.” – GWS

    It’s reached five pages so some people aren’t bored.

  • 226.TheTackler: Reply to this comment

    @Muttonbird(Muttonbird)-224: Loose? Lose?

  • 227.Muttonbird: Reply to this comment

    @charo(charo)-223: 2nd blackest time in New Zealand rugby history.

  • 228.TheTackler: Reply to this comment

    @Big Hit(Big Hit)-220: It’s 8-1. That bad.

  • 229.Muttonbird: Reply to this comment

    @TheTackler(TheTackler)-226: Heard you had a habit of doing that.

  • 230.TheTackler: Reply to this comment

    @Black Panther(Black Panther)-221: Half of the 1986 Cavaliers were hanging on for the one last unfulfilled ambition to hurrah off their career — a tour of SA against the Boks. And so, mission accomplished, they retired after coming home and that’s why they weren’t in the 87 RWC squad — they weren’t even contending for a place in it. They’d quit.

    Only two current 1985 ABs refused to tour with the Cavaliers — Graham Mourie and John Kirwan.

    The Cavaliers were indeed as close to a full-strength AB team as makes no difference, no doubt about it.

    No point in pretending otherwise.

    And, as the Gleneagles Agreement had forbidden OFFICIAL tours, the South Africans (who weren’t consulted or signatories of that agreement) went the unofficial route as it was the only one available to them.

    Nothing wrong with that. One hardly expects a turkey to slit its own throat. SARU (or, rather, its forerunner, SARB) had a duty to advance Springbok rugby, and not a duty to worry about any other countries’ sporting interests.

    So they did what they deemed best in 1986. And they did it well, following it up with a “World Invitation” two-test tour in 1989.

  • 231.Black Panther: Reply to this comment

    @TheTackler(TheTackler)-230:

    John Kirwan and David Kirk

    The ABs best player

    and

    The RWC winning Captain.

  • 232.Black Panther: Reply to this comment

    @Big Hit(Big Hit)-220:

    Consistently the best open-rugby matchup on the Planet, bar none. 2 teams running it all day, hammer and tongs, having a go, mate.

    You Tube the ‘Cannon punch’ on Mealamu* and tell me Bledisloe Cups are boring and mean nothing !

    Kevvie takes a great one right on the snoz and comes back for more……..yyyyyyyyyyyyyEAH baby !

  • 233.skopskiet: Reply to this comment

    Agree some the greatest showdowns of all time have been Aus / NZ Bledisloe encounters where no quarters are given, asked, nor taken. Tomorrow promises to be right up there with some others of recent memory. None of this boring as f’ng heinous garbage that the likes of JW and his crony disciples drone out year after dumb f’ck year. kicking and chasing and seeking out intercepts and long range drop goals to eternity, play without the ball, cower into the laager and kick your self to sleep kind of nonentity game plan.

    At least when NZ meets Aus, they play rugby, they recognize exactly what the object of the exercise is about, like crossing the opposition try line, that is prima strategy nomero uno, cross the opposition try line with whatever means at your disposal, not hope and pray that after you up n under for the umpteenth time somebody over yonder gonna drop the ball and hand you another lucky packet win like WC 2007.

  • 234.Black Panther: Reply to this comment

    @skopskiet(yliad)-233:

    we do a strange thing in NZ (many, actually) when we wish to show ‘respect’.

    We bow down and do The Messiah.

  • 235.cab: Reply to this comment

    What? No bokke this wend, 7s rugby toss it about, battle of the cheats. Is their amy decent NH rugby on?

  • 236.Black Panther: Reply to this comment

    Q:- What do you call the match for 3rd place in the TriN ?

    A:- The Currie Cup; its always a Sth African team.

  • 237.skopskiet: Reply to this comment

    cab just canna wait for the annual England-Italy monstrous melodrama of mammoth proportions, puts NZ – Aus rivalry in the shade, 2 huffing and puffing menopausal monstrosity power packs hefferlumping their way to oblivion in inches and falling over each others pompous Romulus rumps in the modder.

    Don’t bother turning on the telly in the morning catchacrabbertjie its just a boring little encounter between two juggernauts of the running game who gonna go hammer and tongs at each other, rather you sleep in late, catch up your snoozy double deluxe twinky two little winks, and store up that energy for when England or Scotland meet up with megalith Italy instead.

  • 238.funkyzoo: Reply to this comment

    How on earth can 60% of the KEO poll participants think that the Wallabies will win by more than 15 points? That’s fairly jaw-dropping.

  • 239.cab: Reply to this comment

    That’s more like it- bit of crash bash bang – like those old mountain rams battering koppe – like the first scrims of old – crunch. Instead what we going to get treated too, a score of 98-96 with no big hits, no vokmaarvoort and no testing of the tightplay – might ad well call it basketball – the sheep ranglers vs Ozzie and skippy show

  • 240.skopskiet: Reply to this comment

    wishful thinking, thats how

  • 241.cab: Reply to this comment

    Right think I will listen to a bit of Florence and the machine, beats old bob the beatnik whisperer hands down

    night night

  • 242.skopskiet: Reply to this comment

    crash bash mash mush smooch smother schlep schlop flop over each other, thats NH rugby in its hay hoe glory, bit like saffa JW rugby reverting to our immaculate emaciated strengths

    Aus – NZ rugby showdowns are the benchmarks of where this game should be at, unlike that 15-6, 5 kicks to 2 adulation of our glorious grandeur nonentity snooze party where if you had to blink you might just have missed the game entirely.

  • 243.captain fantail: Reply to this comment

    @TheTackler(TheTackler)-216: He knows they are screwed before they start. He has not stated one cold fact or made one relative statement in his (tongue in cheek)summary of the case. A lawyer whose client is looking at the ‘chair’ and he is trying to squash DNA, finger prints and eye witness with rhetoric and conjecture.@skopskiet(yliad)-237: LMFAO Skop, keep it up!It brings a picture to mind of a Hippo trying to mount a Rhino on a muddy field and cant get its footing ;-)

    I really and respectively think the Wallabies really need a name change….it just doesnt seem to cut it and the Wallaby is an even smaller and more timid creature than the kangaroo..
    like the ‘Rose’ what were they thinking of a punch of petals?
    No we should open a big debate and help the Wallys find something with some Grit and character, a name of sterner meaning.

    I mean OZ has Croc’s and some of the worlds deadliest creatures both on land and in the waterways and oceans, insects like the spiders and a massive history of the Aboriginal culture to draw on. Buffalo and Tasmanian tigers etc and some bright spark comes up with wallaby..?
    Look at some of the names of the league teams..Cronulla Sharks, St George Dragons, Broncos, Raiders etc…NZ Warriors, Titans and Eagles. Even the state teams are better placed to some degree in the naming stakes, even the Brumbys give more of an image of something wild and strong( historically it ties in with the man from snowy river). Even the Q’land Reds Koala looks more ferocious than the how the Wallaby is presented!!

  • 244.TheTackler: Reply to this comment

    @captain fantail(captain fantail)-243: He’s pulling your leg, pilgrim.

  • 245.TheTackler: Reply to this comment

    @Black Panther(Black Panther)-231: David Kirk wasn’t an All Black when the Cavaliers were picked. He was still “up and coming”. Kirwan was an AB, and a great winger. But wingers really have very little influence on the overall brilliance of any team. Lomu wasn’t the key reason why the 1996 ABs beat the world champion Boks. The players that have the greatest influence on the excellence of a team wear number 10 and below.

  • 246.TheTackler: Reply to this comment

    @funkyzoo(funkyzoo)-238: There’s some sort of virus in that poll system.

  • 247.Gertjie die Brandweer Ertjie: Reply to this comment

    Stegmann moet (moes) daar wees. Hy het in die S14 vir Brussouw ore aangesit.

    Ja, refs like hom nie. Maar hy is on par met die beste fetchers – ons sou the BIL verloor het, want Supersnor wou nie Brussouw kies nie, gelukkig het die noodlot ons gehelp,

    Frankensteyn ook, maar die laaitie en PdV se ego’s bots.

    Regardless, ons grootste probleme is… – Coaches

    (Unrelated:

    Nadat Gary Gold gewaai het by die WP/Stormers, het hulle skrum baie verbeter.

    Os doen nou ons skrum afrigting.

    Wat presies is jou job description as jy forwards coach is, maar jy kan nie eers jou skrums fix nie?

    Gary Gold is ‘n quota coach, en die manier wat hy die afgelope tyd gatgabbas raak met die joernaliste spreek boekdele.

    **** Muir word ge-expose vir wie hy is – die Sharks se sukses is as gevolg van Plumtree)

    Kry Heyneke in vir forwards coach, Slaptjip vir Backline coach, en gooi Allister Coetzee in vir good measure.

  • 248.captain fantail: Reply to this comment

    @TheTackler(TheTackler)-244: ..Hence the ‘tongue in cheek comment’…pilgrim.

  • 249.TheTackler: Reply to this comment

    So, if you know it’s TIC, you mustn’t let Fitz wind you up so much, pilgrim. Bad for the blood pressure and all.

  • 250.KevinRack: Reply to this comment

    Watch the video how Mcaw cheats and watch the refs duplicity
    http: //www.youtube com/watch?v=pdr-W775hk4&feature= player_embedded

    We now Pdiddy for his comments but this is shocking. Its destroying the integrity of rugby.

  • 251.TheTackler: Reply to this comment

    @KevinRack(KevinRack)-250: Bah humbug! McCaw sizes up ALL the refs from all over the world and he quickly reads where there limits are and what each one will let him get away with, and he adjusts his game accordingly. He doesn’t only have one ref whom he can exploit to maximum advantage.

    That’s precisely why he’s the best rugby player on earth. Lesser players ought to watch and learn from this master of his craft.

  • 252.TheTackler: Reply to this comment

    their, not there… pardon. (line 2 post 251)

  • 253.Great White Shark: Reply to this comment

    How easily the Kiwis get riled up. So much for First World education, that one can’t see a stitch up telegraphing itself from five miles away..

    Should see even refereeing decisions today as the bullying Boers aren’t playing so the game should be even keeled, safe and predictably boring, as is the norm with ALL Australasian rivalries.

    Prepare to break out the ‘Stay awake’ tablets.

  • 254.TheTackler: Reply to this comment

    @Great White Shark(Predawn)-253: Everyone saw the leg-pull, pilgrim. Well, almost everyone.

  • 255.aliboy: Reply to this comment

    That clip certainly shows the AB’s getting away with some illegal play. Would be interesting to see the same ‘analysis’ (not sure if I should dignify it with that name) done on the Boks for the entire match as well? Even one of those ‘anti-AB’ clips shows a Bok player driving over the top of a ruck, going off his feet and then using his hands to slow the AB ball. Would other clips show similar?

    I am not sure how the ‘commentator’ of that clip was applying the rules, but below are the actual rules. Apply these to some (I agree not all)of the ‘illegal’ play by RM etc and suddenly it doesn’t look so illegal. Take the penalty given against RM near the AB try line. He tackled Roussow around the legs, released him, got to his feet, and reached for the ball. When he was pushed off his feet he released the ball. What is illegal about that? It just looks bad because he is so quick the Bok forwards arrived so slowly. In fact it was interesting watching those clips to see how often there were twice as many black shirts as green shirts!

    As for some of the clip ‘commentators’ other comments, he either didn’t watch his own clip or just chose to misrepresent some of the actions.

    15.4 THE TACKLER
    (a) When a player tackles an opponent and they both go to ground, the tackler must immediately release the tackled player.
    Sanction: Penalty kick

    (b) The tackler must immediately get up or move away from the tackled player and from the ball at once.
    Sanction: Penalty kick

    (c) The tackler must get up before playing the ball and then may play the ball from any direction.
    Sanction: Penalty kick

  • 256.KevinRack: Reply to this comment

    It’s an Aussie video preparing for today’s game! Same tactics 2?games in a row
    The Aussies employed exactly the same game plan using the no3 as the guardian/obsrtucter

    I think PDiddy might be smarter than we think cos now as SANZOO has charged him he can use video in his defence

    This kinda play is as disgraceful as eye gouging and destroys the integrity of the game

  • 257.KevinRack: Reply to this comment

    Watch the video how Mcaw cheats and watch the refs duplicity
    http: //www.youtube com/watch?v=pdr-W775hk4&feature= player_embedded

  • 258.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    @KevinRack(KevinRack)-256: “This kinda play is as disgraceful as eye gouging”

    and people accuse me of whinging, you havent stopped since Kevin..

    eye gouging CAN maim for life.. guess thats alright though in the bully boys handbook to thuggery?

    what a joke…

  • 259.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    @Great White Shark(Predawn)-253: stay awake tablets prespawn??

    bwahahaha only when watching a team incorporate the kick chase game plan year after year…as exciting as watching grown men wearing armbands to blindly lead their sheepish supporters..

    “justice 4″ the bokke because everyone picks on them, its a conspiracy.. :wink:

  • 260.KevinRack: Reply to this comment

    The sad thing Poppa is this is SARU’s job to highlight these isses! here we have the ausssies who are very smart highlighting the isssues before the game!
    ARU might not have the worlds best players but they know how to play smart rugby on and off the field
    Something we can learn from both SANZAR partners

  • 261.TheTackler: Reply to this comment

    @aliboy(aliboy)-255: It’s not illegal unless and until the ref rules it so. The ref is the sole judge of fact. Says so in the law-book.

    That’s a fact.

  • 262.Black Panther: Reply to this comment

    .

    PAH ! what would those ex-players know anyway……

    “Does this man get away with murder?

    New Zealand captain Richie McCaw.

    PHIL WAUGH and Rod Kafer have weighed into the debate surrounding Richie McCaw’s activities at the breakdown, but far from branding the All Blacks skipper a repeat transgressor have urged the Wallabies to follow his ‘’smart” style of play.

    As Robbie Deans’s men prepare to face the seemingly unstoppable All Blacks at Etihad Stadium next Saturday, Waugh said the Wallabies shouldn’t read much into comments by Springboks coach Pieter de Villiers that referees are turning a blind eye to McCaw’s foul play.

    ”It’s about responding to how the referees interpret the breakdown during the game – and obviously all referees are different,” Waugh said. ”And the quicker you get the interpretations right for the game the better you’re going to perform in the game.

    ”Richie’s a very astute and smart rugby player who picks that up very early in the game, which allows him to push the limits. And that’s what he’s out there to do.

    ”He’s obviously been a real leader in the game ever since he came on to the scene in 2001 and he’s very good at it. He’s probably had times and moments during the past few years where he hasn’t got away with it as much as he would have liked. But in any circumstance, people in our position push the limits and he’s obviously one of the best at getting on the right side of that fine line.

    ”It’s about being influential in the game and he’s getting back to where he was three or four years ago of being a real influence on the game and good luck to him. You’ve got to push the game to the limit.”

    Expert commentator Kafer agreed with Waugh and said the Wallabies could do worse than try to imitate aspects of the All Blacks’ game. ”It’s pretty obvious the Springboks are playing last year’s rugby and the All Blacks are playing next year’s rugby – I think Australia’s stuck somewhere in between,” he said. ”That’s probably the difference for the All Blacks.”

    Kafer urged Australia to play an expansive game next Saturday or risk the same fate as the Springboks, who suffered consecutive losses to New Zealand in the first two matches of the 2010 Tri Nations series.

    ”Richie has changed his game quite significantly. The way he plays he’s become much more of a link player,” he said. ”But for a variety of reasons against the Springboks it suited him to go back to the old-school Richie McCaw of being a real factor at the breakdown. The Springboks played it very tight and that played into Richie’s hands.

    ”If you play it tight then he’s always somewhere in and around the breakdown. If you play anything close you’re going to run into him. And that’s dangerous.”

    While Kafer has no issue with McCaw’s tactics at the breakdown he did suggest his stature in the game has some effect on how McCaw is treated by referees.

    ”Every player tries to make the most of the breakdown and Richie McCaw’s got the slight advantage of being captain – he commands a little bit more respect from the referees from time to time, I think,” he said. ”But I’m happy for him to do the same thing against Australia. I don’t think it’s illegal whatsoever.”.

    What was that again, Rod ?

    “I don’t think it’s illegal whatsoever.”.

  • 263.Black Panther: Reply to this comment

    @TheTackler(TheTackler)-245:

    um, “thanks, Pilgrim”, you can let a real Kiwi take over from here.

    David Kirk started his AB career in 1983 and by 1985 had toured UK and Aus with the ABs and played 4 Tests in 1985. By that time he was the no1 no9.

    And here’s a little something extracted from the History books, pilgrim:-

    “David Kirk’s smile and boyish features were often described as New Zealand rugby’s best public relations tools, especially in the turbulent and momentous years of 1986 and 1987. In the first year there was the turmoil caused by the Cavaliers’ unauthorised tour of South Africa, and in the second, the World Cup triumph. Kirk had a central role in both.

    But in view of the favourable image that he left, as a university-educated medical doctor and academic it was surprising that, if not always of his own making, his career was embroiled in so much controversy.

    Kirk’s late withdrawal from the Cavaliers’ tour irked many of that side’s senior players and organisers and that resentment was increased later in 1986 when he was made captain of the so-called Baby Blacks that played tests against France and Australia.”.

    As for your assessment of JK, well you clearly didnt live in NZ by then. He was the biggest name in the ABs, bar none.

  • 264.Wayne Barnes No.1 Ref: Reply to this comment

    looking forward to the abs choking under the aussie ambush tonight as usual. the ref has probably got his eye on mccheat this time and im also looking forward watching him get man handled by pocock

  • 265.Wayne Barnes No.1 Ref: Reply to this comment

    the new zealand pretenders are nothing but a bad stain on the underpants of society.

  • 266.KWAGGA ROBERTSE: Reply to this comment

    @Wayne Barnes No.1 Ref(sipher)-265: Touch of class there Wayne

  • 267.TheTackler: Reply to this comment

    @Wayne Barnes No.1 Ref(sipher)-265: The “NZ Pretenders” put eight tries and sixty points past the “world champions” in 160 minutes. Pretty convincing pretending, to be 2-0 up with only one more to play! Just as well they didn’t stop pretending and started taking it seriously then?

  • 268.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    @goyougoodthing2(goyougoodthing2)-144: Interesting perspective… Maybe more than some truth there

  • 269.TheTackler: Reply to this comment

    @Black Panther(Black Panther)-263: 4 tests is the mark of a greenhorn and a back-up. JK is a winger and wingers are never crucial kingpins in any rugby team — not even Lomu.

  • 270.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @KevinRack(KevinRack)-256:
    Pathetic
    Cheating is as bad as eye gouging?? Is that what you said.
    You name one player in rugby that hasnt been penalised?
    If you are penalised,you have cheated somewhere along the line,isnt that right?

  • 271.TheTackler: Reply to this comment

    The Cavaliers were a full-strength AB team. Kirk and JK really wouldn’t have made a blind bit of difference and to give that out as the main excuse why the Cavaliers lost the series is pretty lame, really. Certainly, none of those players used it.

  • 272.Black Panther: Reply to this comment

    @TheTackler(TheTackler)-269:

    .

    Nice version of “I was wrong” there, Tickler.

    Captain Kirk started all of his 4 Tests in 1985 including the crucial Test vs Aus where he commanded Eden Park.

    Goldie grew up wanting to be JK. Do you remember Goldie, Tickler ?

    or perhaps you can remember an injured, old age pensioner, also by the name of Kirwan who – 6 years later in 1992 – scored the winning try vs the Boks in Sth Africa in 1992 ?

    man up, Pilgrim.

  • 273.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @Wayne Barnes No.1 Ref(sipher)-264:
    Cool name. But even the South Africans think your a cr@p ref,goodnight

  • 274.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    @KevinRack(KevinRack)-260: I agree Kevin, you guys need another Doc Craven at the helm…

  • 275.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    laugh at the Polls.
    Ozzie by 15+,but hey it could happen.
    But i think it just shows how hated the ABs are in SA by a few people.

  • 276.TheTackler: Reply to this comment

    Goldie, the over-rated over-emotional Otago winger who was so memorably utterly undone over the try-line by Gregan? Hard to forget him, if only for that. Goldie would surely have had a soulmate in the emotionally-unstable JK who ran the length of the field to score one of a bagful of tries against the 1987 rugby super-power of Italy.

    Wingers are just the flash-harry glory-hound finishers, pilgrim. They score tries and hog the limelight, but the REAL difference-makers wear the single-digit jerseys in any test team. Lots of small boys are dazzled by flashy twinkletoed wingers and want to be like them. What little boy wants to be a Carl Hayman or a Brad Thorn or any of those big grubby cauliflower-eared grunts toiling deep in the engine room? Not a lot.

    But they’re the real match-winners.

  • 277.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane(Hurricane)-275: I agree totally mate… so funny, wonder how many are repeat votes.. :wink:

  • 278.Great White Shark: Reply to this comment

    The Cavaliers lost because they got smashed by the Green Machine. The Boks were super motivated for the Kiwis and the public demanded a win at all costs.

    Some of those Cavaliers players still wake up screaming at the intensity and brutality of the tests. Going back to play Australia was like taking a slumber in comparison.

  • 279.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @Great White Shark(Predawn)-278:
    Yeah,few came back with bite marks and sore eyes etc.
    Wasnt it reffed by South African refs?

    Anyway at that time Ozzie were the NZs hardest team to play against.Looks like not much has changed. :-)
    I think only 5-6 players from the Cavaliers were amongst the 22 odd players that made the RWC in 1987

  • 280.Great White Shark: Reply to this comment

    Lets see the game bru. :-)

  • 281.blacklash: Reply to this comment

    here comes another train wreck next week!!!!!!!

  • 282.Black Panther: Reply to this comment

    @TheTackler(TheTackler)-276:

    Th reference was to the value of wingers in SA, as if Jonah was not the only one to be kept tryless vs SA.

    The ABs of 1996 achieved immortality at Loftus Versfeld when they recorded that magnificent Series victory over the RWChampions on their own turf. This victory owed much to the Golden boy of Southland, who raced in for not 1 but 2 magnificent solo efforts down the sideline. Given the late comeback from the Boks that threatened to steal victory from the jaws of defeat, it would be agreed that it was the wingers brace that proved to be the difference.

  • 283.JL1: Reply to this comment

    @Black Panther(Black Panther)-272:
    [hide]
    v • d • e
    New Zealand Cavaliers 1986 squad
    Forwards
    Anderson · Ashworth · Dalton (c) · Earl · Haden · Hobbs · Knight · McDowell · Mexted · Mills · Pierce · Reid · Shaw · Shelford, F · Shelford, W · Whetton, A · Whetton, G
    Backs
    Clamp · Crowley · Deans · Donald · Fraser · Fox · Green · Loveridge · Osborne · Pokere · Robins · Smith · Simpson · Taylor
    Coach
    Meads

    1987 final team
    John Gallagher; John Kirwan, Warwick Taylor, Joe Stanley, Craig Green; Grant Fox, David Kirk; John Drake, Sean Fitzpatrick, Steven McDowell; Murray Pierce, Gary Whetton; Michael Jones, Alan Whetton, Buck Shelford

    Seem if you compare notes they still picked many Cavaliers

    Talk about a lucky packet RWC trophy

    Playing Scotland in the quarters and Wales in the semi and France in the final

  • 284.Big Hit: Reply to this comment

    @TheTackler(TheTackler)-276: got to agree there tackler, the rest of the team is obviously important but winning is all about numbers 1-5 dominating the collisions and providing front foot ball.

    Bakkies and Thorn would be my lock combo, Tom Croft at blindside to handle the lineout.

  • 285.Black Panther: Reply to this comment

    @JL1(JL1)-283:

    Only 4 of those Cavaliers were regular starters in the 4 Invitation International matches in SA, that then ended up in the RWC Final team. The team were, partic in the pack, geriatrics before the tour was delayed by 18mths, they had no chance of making the RWC.

    Scotland were lead by Big Gav and were the strongest British team. They were full of Lions starting players. In 1986 they were 2nd in the 5 Nations having beaten France, the eventual winners. France turned up in NZ as Grand Slam winners’87.

    That was the QuarterFinal. A bit tougher than Fiji then.

  • 286.thambolenje: Reply to this comment

    @Big Hit(Big Hit)-284: The tight five are important, but really it comes down to the front row. If they are kuk you can’t win…see Eddie Andrews and Jon Smit as props. The next most important thing is the breakdowns; without a classy scavenger you can’t retain or win possession after the scrum.
    And the loss of Fourie at number 9 has just exposed SA’s lack of depth..or selection problems!

Keo.co.za has always promoted uncensored views, but has never tolerated racist or crass outbursts. Come on guys and girls. If you can't moderate yourselves or each other then I am going to be forced to regulate the posts and enforce a registration process for comments. The choice is yours.

Have your say

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Not for sale to Persons under the age of 18. Drink Responsibly.